"California Son" review by Laura Snapes (1 star, obvs) - The Guardian

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by BookishBoy, May 24, 2019.

By BookishBoy on May 24, 2019 at 9:06 AM
  1. BookishBoy

    BookishBoy Active Member

    Feb 28, 2019
    Despite not being sent a copy to review, the Guardian has - of course! - reviewed the album anyway.

    Morrissey: California Son review – clumsy covers with a troll-like spirit (1 of 5 stars) - The Guardian

    In the words of Laura Snapes: "it is impossible to hear a number of the covers on California Son in anything but a chilling light."

    And they're rather proud of this 1-star review, also mentioning it in their report of the Liverpool posters incident:


    Related item:
    Last edited by a moderator: May 24, 2019
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1


Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by BookishBoy, May 24, 2019.

    1. Uncleskinny
      Morrissey: California Son review – clumsy covers with a troll-like spirit

      A week after Morrissey appeared on a late-night talk show wearing a badge in support of an anti-Islam, far-right minor political party (not to mention the preceding decade of contentious proclamations), it is impossible to hear a number of the covers on California Son in anything but a chilling light. Dylan’s Only a Pawn in Their Game, about the US government’s weaponising of poor white people in the civil rights movement, takes on a sinister tone. When Morrissey sings “You can do what’s right or you can do what you are told,” on Days of Decision, it resonates less as Phil Ochs’s original appeal to fairness than a slimy warning against falling in line with political correctness.

      Quite why Morrissey has decided to record an album of protest-adjacent covers at this point in his career is unclear. It hardly chimes with his public persona (although he is a known fan of original purveyors such as Jobriath). Nor does it bring out any hitherto untapped range. He wheezes through Gary Puckett and the Union Gap’s Lady Willpower like an exhumed Tom Jones, and hearing him preening on Don’t Interrupt the Sorrow – given an arduously heavy makeover by his band – feels like a violation of Joni Mitchell’s mythically light original. There are vaguely intriguing gender wrinkles – he sings as the female protagonist of Melanie’s Some Say I Got the Devil, and pleads with Bill to get down on one knee on Laura Nyro’s Wedding Bell Blues – but such winking provocations are crushed by the troll-like spirit of the endeavour.

      • Troll Troll x 7
      • Funny Funny x 2
      • Informative Informative x 2
    2. gordyboy9
      scumbags united.wouldnt wipe my arse with this rag.
      • Like Like x 1
    3. Anonymous
      I'm surprised it actually got so highly rated as 1 out of 5. I was expecting 0, or maybe even negative numbers.
    4. NealCassidy
      lol you accuse everyone else of ignoring reviews contrary to their own views
      • Like Like x 2
    5. Ugly Devil
      Ugly Devil
      It's no coincidence that all these 1 star reviews are conceived by pale ghastly looking malnourished creatures. Genderless in appearance with all the sex appeal of stale pork pie, with its innards gouged out. The kind of spiteful self-righteous introvert that you'd seeing loitering in a charity shop; unkempt with an odour of incense candles.
      • Like Like x 1
    6. The Truth
      The Truth
      It is true though that the words to some of these songs come across differently when you hear them in light of Morrissey's comments over the past few years. But they take one line from the Phil Ochs song, “You can do what’s right or you can do what you are told,” and make quite a leap to interpret it as being "against political correctness." I'd see it more as being "against" what you're told by government and media. If you look at the song's original intent it's clearly "against" racism.
      Now it's fair enough to interpret Morrissey's choices of covers politically as he has seemed to become more of a media figure known for his remarks than for his music over the past ten years or so. But it's not a record of political speeches and should probably be dealt with more as a collection of interpretations of songs. Many times songwriters will reveal a lot in the songs they choose to cover.
      I think what might be more interesting than taking individual lines from the songs and trying to explain them according to various things Morrissey may have said is to just understand that a song can mean different things depending on context. Different people can sing the same song and give it a very different meaning. I'm not saying Morrissey's meaning is different than the original song but just that we can all relax a little bit and listen to the songs to see what you might get from it. Clearly the review wasn't going to be great and the Guardian seems to see their ability to give poor reviews when advance albums aren't provided as some kind of great power. When you go to their page to read the review they're begging for money so clearly they need Morrissey more than he needs them.
      None of that matters. What I'm saying is that the fact that they could get that particular specific meaning from that carefully chosen line (when other lines make that reading very difficult to support) really just means that a song is alive and can change and be given new meanings over time. Anyone who thinks they have discovered "the meaning" of any of these songs is trying to contain something that will shift and evaporate.
      If they want to talk about his politics and beliefs he's given them much more than they or anyone needed to work with over the past few years but to try to attach any of that to any of these songs in a definitive way doesn't make sense. When he sings these songs live they might not even "mean" exactly the same thing from night to night.
      • Like Like x 1
    7. ordinaryboy86
      Learn to laugh
    8. Uncleskinny
      Imagine marking down a review you don't like. You soft fuckers.
      • Troll Troll x 6
      • Like Like x 1
      • Dislike Dislike x 1
    9. Anonymous
      Imagine spending your entire life glued to the website of a pop star (a pop star!) you don't even like.
      The internet has destroyed you.
      • Like Like x 3
      • Funny Funny x 2
    10. ordinaryboy86
      Fuckin pathetic innit, you gotta swallow Morrisseys dick to be accepted on this site. Full of absolute cry babies.
      • Like Like x 3
    11. NealCassidy
      refused a preview copy....turns out they don't like it STOP PRESS
      • Like Like x 1
      • Funny Funny x 1
    12. Anonymous
      I know. I’m shocked by this
    13. ordinaryboy86
      Hilarious isn’t it. What must it feel like to be so butthurt 24/7. Getting upset over a poor review, it’s not your album is it? Fancy crying and get angry on Morrisseys behalf.
    14. NealCassidy
      don't they have a 0/5 grading?
      • Funny Funny x 2
    15. countthree
      They had to buy their own copy :lbf:
      • Like Like x 1
      • Funny Funny x 1
    16. Famous when dead
      Famous when dead
      I'd like to think that they'd got the album from the download section here - where it's been available for 'review' since Monday ;)
      • Funny Funny x 3
      • Like Like x 1
    17. Musician
      This is the first ever Morrissey studio album I don't bother listening. Not going to take sides or dive in the childish shit that goes on this site...it has nothing to do with Morrissey's opinion on anything, or political stance, I just happen to agree with the starting words of this review - ''clumsy covers''....I get Morrissey willingly didn't choose hits or known songs but these are just boring, uninteresting songs to cover.
      • Interesting Interesting x 1
    18. Pokey
      Imagine still hanging around the website of an artist you clearly don’t like for years and years on end.
    19. gordyboy9
      I wouldn't say that,iv got absolutely nothing against people having a go as long as its justified,i think a 1/10 review of a well received album is frankly taking the piss.

Share This Page