British Nationalist Podcast Discusses Morrissey

A

Anonymous

Guest
All these people are foreigners who belong in their own country. They fought for their own part of the empire and that is where they should have stayed. In case you havent (sic) noticed we gave them all independence. We now want independence ourselves....from them.
You gave them nothing. They attained their their own independence. Keep deluding yourself. It clearly is all the consolation you have for the inanity and all too obvious powerlessness that's your everyday life. That which you wish to return back to will ultimate reject and discard you. Good evening to you. :blushing:
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Says the individual who takes his cue and inspiration from those who saw the disabled as "useless eaters", exterminating at least 240,000 of their own fellow citizens (men, women & children) as a dry run for the genocide of at least 6,000,000 Jews, Gypsies, gays, lesbians, Trade Unionists, Socialists, Communists, intellectuals, Afro-Germans and anyone else deemed "un-Aryan" and "inferior". Mocking your lack of grammar is but nothing next to your cynical attempt at claiming "victimhood". The disabled friends I know don't need your self-serving "sympathy", believe me. They'd be too quick to let you know where to get off with yourself.
And trust me, they would too.





Lest We Forget: Eradicating the 'Useless Eaters' in the Third Reich Richard Rieser


The Nazis murdered at least 240,000 disabled people, according to the Government of Germany, who in 2005 issued an apology to their relatives. How did doctors,nurses and others trained to save lives end up planning and killing thousands of disabled Germans? Drawing on the development of a false science called 'Eugenics' developed in the UK and America, Hitler and the National Socialists instituted measures for compulsory sterilisation of men and women suffering from hereditary diseases inJuly 1933 soon after coming to power.In ancient Greece, which was made up of city states they relied on warriors to maintain their power and empire. Physical or mental impairment was viewed as an unacceptable weakness. Aristotle and Plato taught that disabled babies should be killed. This was the start of eugenics.Over 2000 years later, in the wake of Darwin's theories of evolution and natural selection, his cousin Sir Francis Galton decided to apply the theories to human society. This entailed arguing that feeble minded and disabled traits should be be got rid of from the gene pool through sterilisation.These ideas soon became popular and in the USA led to laws on compulsory sterilisation of born deaf women and for those with an IQ below 70 in 33 states.As migration to the USA shifted from Western Europe to Eastern and Southern Europe eugenicists campaigned for genetic monitoring of immigrants and Ellis Island was set up for this purpose with over 100,000 immigrants being sent back to Europe as medically or genetically unfit for American citizenship.In the UK the Mental Deficiencies Act of 1913, argued for by Winston Churchill, was passed and led to the incarceration of up to half a million disabled people in single sex mental deficiency hospitals.Hitler drew on these ideas and in 'Mein Kampf' (1923) argued for the killing of those suffering from incurable and painful diseases.So on the first opportunity after coming to power Hitler introduced the sterilisation Law 1933 ( see Law for the Protection of Germany translated on this section of the website).“(1) Anyone suffering from a hereditary disease could be sterilised by means of a surgical operation if it could be expected with some certainty, according to the experiences of medical science, that his posterity would suffer from serious physical or mental hereditary disease. (2) Persons would be considered as hereditary diseased in the sense of this law ifthey suffered from any one of the following diseases: is to be regarded as inherit-ably diseased within the meaning of this law: 1. congenital feeble-mindedness 2. schizophrenia 3. manic-depression 4. congenital epilepsy 5. inheritable St. Vitus dance (Huntington's Chorea) 6. hereditary blindness 7. hereditary deafness 8. serious inheritable malformations (3.) In addition, anyone suffering from chronic alcoholism may also be sterilized.”This was expanded in 1935 into a law "to safeguard the hereditary health of the German People". This introduced compulsory termination where either partner had hereditary impairments such as deafness.However, Hitler was still far from the objective he had proposed in 1923. The next phase involved a propaganda campaign with a series of documentaries distorted through lighting and cutting to show 'the life unworthy of life' of many in institutions and the need to get rid of the 'burden on the German worker'-'the useless eaters'. These films were shown in all German Cinemas between 1936-1939. 'Ich Klage An', a full length drama was also made and screened on the need for mercy killing. The propaganda began to work and families wrote to Hitler asking for help to kill their poor disabled relatives out of an act of mercy.Hartheim Castle, a "euthanasia" killing centre where the physically and mentally disabled were killed by gassing and lethal injection. Hartheim, Austria (USHMM Photo). Germany was still nominally a Christian country. An opinion was obtained from Professor Joseph Mayer - a well known Catholic Professor of Theology - which argued in Christian terms that 'Mercy Killing' could be accepted. The Pope's representative and leaders of the Protestant Church were also consulted on this opinion and although not happy did not make any objection in public.Hitler set up T4 which got its name from number 4 Tiergarten Strasser, Berlin where Reichsleiter Bouhler and a medical expert Dr Brandt were planning a programme o fextermination of disabled people.A number of propaganda films and advertisement posters were widely circulated by Joseph Goebbels, Propaganda Department to prepare the German Population forgiving up their family members to put them out of their misery for ‘mercy killing’. Hitler was petitioned by some parents to kill their disabled children. The Knauer Childin 1937 became the first and the beginning of a much more sinister plan to be launched as war broke out. First clearing the hospitals of long term disabled inmate sand then extending much wider.4Prussian Government 1937 Ad to show waste of money educating disabled children
[Nazi Propaganda Films Sequence illustrating lighting techniques used in Nazi propaganda film Erbank III. 1936. The Nazis made 7 short films shown in cinemas to get the people to see why they should get rid of disabled people. Here different up lighting is being used to make the inmate of a mental hospital seem more frightening."You are bearing this too,"informing the 'German worker' that a hereditarily ill person costs 50,000 RMs to maintain until he or she has reached the age of 60. (from Death and Deliverance - 'Euthanasia' in Germany 1900-1945 by Michael Burleigh) Dr Lang (Wiemann) consoling a distressed Hanna Heyt (Hatheyer) in a scene from ‘ I Accuse’. Hanna’s vivid descriptions of the terrifying terminal condition she wishes to pre-empt through ‘ mercy killing’ corresponded precisely with the sort of language used by the Nazis to denigrate the disabled and mentally ill. Propaganda films in the Third Reich Hitler’s Germany used film to great effect to reach the masses. As well as feature films, film was used as documentary propaganda. The Racial and Political Officemade five films: • Suden der Vater (Sins of the Fathers,1935) • Abseits von Wege (Off the Path,1935)• Alles Leben ist Kampf (All Life is a Struggle, 1937)• Was du ererbt (What you have inherited)• Erbkrank III (Heredity III, 1936). This film, intended to criminalise, degrade and dehumanise the mentally and physically impaired was silent and shot in black and white. The victims were manipulated to make them appear horrific, with superimposed captions of the cost ofkeeping them alive. Using direct interviews with disabled people, cleverly lit and staged, filmed from below and cut to make them appear very different from ordinary workers, it made the audience sympathise with compulsory sterilisation and, later,mercy killing. By Hitler’s order, it was shown in all German cinemas.Let the killing begin In October 1939 after war had been declared Hitler issued a secret decree backdated to 1st September spuriously based on a letter from a parent. T4developed a programme to expand the authority of physicians, who were designated by name, to examine patients who were considered incurable in the best available judgement and after critical evaluation of their condition grant them mercy killing.It was not 'mercy killing'. It was a programme of mass murder of mentally and physically impaired people. All hospitals were trawled to find the senile, those with learning difficulties and mental health issues, under care for more than 5 years,incapable of work or only capable of routine work. Forms were sent to T4 where they were marked Life or Death.400 doctors, nurses and SS worked on the programme. After the war only a couple were brought to trial for this. Many went on to be respected Professors of Medicine around the world. At the Nuremberg Trials it was suggested 275,000 patients in hospitals had been killed. The German Government in 2004 apologised for 250,000.Edwin Black (War Against the Weak) has suggested that the figure is neared 1million disabled people if one takes account of all the children and disabled peoplenot in institutions in Greater Germany and the Occupied Territories. It is estimate atleast 1 third of deaf people were also murdered.Killing Map of disabled people shows the 6 Hospitals Hadamar, Bernberg, Sonnestein, Hartheim, Bradenberg and Grafeneck- where killing by gas was developed and the many hospitals where lethal injections were administered right up until the end of the War 1945.Killing of disabled children at first this applied only the children up to the age of 3, but after 1941 this project included youths to the age of 16.A red cross on the form was a death sentence and victims were taken in blacked out buses to 6 castles which served as killing centres. The mass killing methods of the concentration camps were perfected here- Cyclon B gas. Over 300 personnel who learned their lethal craft on disabled people went on to person the camps in Poland where the 'final solution' for the Jewish People took place. The dehumanising of the Guards and personnel on those ‘not worthy of life’ was good preparation for the mass killing of ‘the final solution’. Particularly at Hadamar given the large numbers hardened up to their job of murder it is clear they were also being trained for the Holocaust.The euthanasia program proved to be a valuable precursor to the atrocities which were to come in connection with the "Final Solution." SS Major Christian Wirth was transferred from his duties at a euthanasia center to take over the supervision of Chelmno, the first of six extermination camps in Poland to become operational. His expertise in mass extermination seems to have been a major consideration. Wirthlater served at Belzec, Treblinka and Sobibor. In 1940, Franz Stabgl was transferred from one of the euthanasia centers to Sobibor extermination camp where he served as camp commander. He performed so well there that he was transferred in the summer of 1942 to Treblinka [Many years later, in 1970, Stangl was extradited from Brazil to West Germany to stand trial. He was found guilty of joint responsibility for the murder of 900,000 Jews]There was resistance from families, church leaders and eventually in August 1941the programme of gassing and burning corpses in crematoria was halted. See Cardinal Clemens von Galen - August 3, 1941speech on this web site.
However, the killing continued using lethal injections or leaving disabled people tostarve and instead of crematoria they used mass graves right up to 1945 in a large number of hospitals.The 'Not Dead Yet' Campaign against Lord Joffy's Bill for 'mercy killing' and current moves for assisted suicide following the case of Diane Pretty court case on this history of disabled people. There can be no place for such legalised killing in a society committed to human rights. We should say to the supporters of mercy killing such as Baroness Warnock that disabled people are fully human and no one has the right to kill us. Cemetery at Hadamar where victims of “euthanasia” at the Hadamar “euthanasia” killing center were buried.

1. Watch Regent University audio visual website on useless eaters to get more detail of the pseudoscientific background and the Nazi Programme. Dr Mark Mostert. The conclusion is inspired by Dr. Mosert’s Christian values, but raises many important issues. 2004 is the date of the site Activities1.Watch the Audio visual web presentation of the useless eaters.http://www.regent.edu/acad/schedu/uselesseaters/Now have group discussion and make the arguments for and against what theNazi’s did to disabled people.

2. Draw a time line of how the Nazi ideas developed . Show how they were rooted back in German society and were influenced by Eugenics thinking in the USA and UK.
3. Read Bishop von Gallen’s sermon against the killing programme. Think you were going to make a short summary of his argument for a news broadcast to get the main points across.

4. What was the connection between the Eugenics programme in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust of Jews, Gypsies and Homosexuals by the Nazi’s .

5. Look at the posters and the film still and suggest how the Nazi Propaganda was designed to effect people.

6. Read the ‘Letter to a Teacher’ on this website. This is from a Holocaust Survivor who went on to become a American High School Principal. Use his arguments to make a list of what the educated doctors and engineers did to disabled people in Nazi Germany.

7. Hold a debate in class on measures to bring in assisted suicide and then write letters to the Prime Minister giving your views.

8. If disabled people are treated without dignity, locked up in institutions, not given the support they need to take part in ordinary activities, be part of families and have a job then they can be seen as a burden. If on the other and they are first seen as human beings with human rights and dignity then disabled people can play a useful role in society and have a valued life. Today we have the (2006) United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities and the Earlier (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. See http://www.worldofinclusion.com/res/UN/UN_Convention.pptand young people and Children’s Versionhttp://www.worldofinclusion.com/res/UN/Its_about_ability.pdf These Human Rights Conventions were adopted by the world in the wake of the terrible human rights abuses committed by the Nazis. They were not the last abusers. Human Rights abuse is still continuing. Make a list of the key human rights and then suggest how these rights could have been met for someone with mental health issues locked in an institution or a deaf person living in Germany . What type of society would be needed and why could Germany in the 3rd Reich not be able to deliver human rights?
To the extent that any of this is even true - some of it may be, I haven't read it because a paragraph of Jewish propaganda is a waste of time, let alone thousands of words - it remains infinitely preferrable to being demonised and dispossessed in your own homeland by third world shit who ruin everything, against a cultural of sexual degeneracy, substance abuse, obesity, family breakdown, isolation, debt, hideous consumerism, nihilism, and mass depression.

Soz.
 
You gave them nothing. They attained their their own independence. Keep deluding yourself. It clearly is all the consolation you have for the inanity and all too obvious powerlessness that's your everyday life. That which you wish to return back to will ultimate reject and discard you. Good evening to you. :blushing:
You don't know real history, only the lying narrative of the current cultural Marxist regime which is under transnational financial occupation. We gave them independence, they have independence, and they can now return to their countries to enjoy it. They have their lands and we have ours. We never settled their countries and we don't want ours settled. We have no intention of being bred out of existance to please degenerate self-hating liberals like you. Move to Somalia, you have forefeited the right to be British.
 
I agree with every word. In my opinion, the decision to let this through the net was a huge mistake. Never ever give the Nazis an inch. Ever.
No, you who call patriots Nazis need to get on a plane to Pakistan and settle there. You have no right as a traitor to live in our country. In any event Civil War is coming to Europe and you will then have to answer for your treachery.

 
Last edited:
A

Anonymous

Guest
You don't know real history, only the lying narrative of the current cultural Marxist regime which is under transnational financial occupation. We gave them independence, they have independence, and they can now return to their countries to enjoy it. They have their lands and we have ours. We never settled their countries and we don't want ours settled. We have no intention of being bred out of existance to please degenerate self-hating liberals like you. Move to Somalia, you have forefeited the right to be British.
Fucking hell! He triggered you like a pro! He has a point, though. You can't do shit all to be where you wish. Sort out yer spelling, son. You're letting the British end down good an' proper!
 
Fucking hell! He triggered you like a pro! He has a point, though. You can't do shit all to be where you wish. Sort out yer spelling, son. You're letting the British end down good an' proper!
Your spelling won't save you in the coming Civil War son. The day when the patriots are seperated from the traitors. The sheep from the wolves. The day the traitors will wish they were not indigenous British because they won't have the option of safely returning home to some other place.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
Your spelling won't save you in the coming Civil War son. The day when the patriots are seperated (sic) from the traitors. The sheep from the wolves. The day the traitors will wish they were not indigenous British because they won't have the option of safely returning home to some other place.
"Dream on and think of love. Because it's the closest you get to love". Sort out the spelling, laddie! You're still letting side down. What a disappointment you reveal yourself as. I'm so sorry. Just not for you, mind. I'm still right here - where I always was. o_O
 

reelfountain

Well-Known Member
Well that's a lie. Find me one local authority housing policy where Muslims are explicitly given priority for LA or HA accommodation. Betcha can't.
Migrants are housed on their day of arrival in the UK. They are given monetary benefits then forwarded for permanent housing onto housing associations who favour them over white people (who would never make the points because of the colour of their skin).

Migrants are given priority in housing. This free housing and money incentivises them to have large families as they know there is a 'higher hand' taking great care of them - providing regular free money, free school education and free health care. They also have more rights than white people as they are seen as victims that must be afforded special 'victim status'. Laws exist also for migrants and ethnic minorities to be given jobs, if they so choose, at the expense of white people.

This is identity politics in action. Migrants at the top of the favouritism list, whites down at the bottom.
 
Last edited:
The homeless sleeping on the streets of Britain, including 13,000 former British soldiers suffering from the mental and physical results of war, are overwhelmingly indigenous British people. Many of the new homeless are living rough due to the housing meant for them being given to racial strangers. These invaders who have just arrived in the country or born here and classified as 'ethnic-minorites' are housed ahead of indigenous Britons on the basis that so-called ethnic minorities are 'vulnerable.'
VETERAN SPAT ON AND URINATED ON IN HIS SLEEP BY MUSLIM INVADERS:
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/homeless-ex-soldier-says-been-10098196
 
Last edited:

reelfountain

Well-Known Member
The homeless sleeping on the streets of Britain, including 13,000 former British soldiers suffering from the mental and physical results of war, are overwhelmingly indigenous British people. Many of the new homeless are living rough due to the housing meant for them being given to racial strangers. These invaders who have just arrived in the country or born here and classified 'ethnic-minority' are housed ahead of indigenous Britons on the basis that so-called ethnic minorities are 'vulnerable.'
VETERAN SPAT ON AND URINATED ON BY MUSLIM INVADERS:
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/homeless-ex-soldier-says-been-10098196
If this man was a Muslim migrant (notice how migrants are usually Muslim) he would instantly be given a roof over his head in a b&b or hotel, then he'd be forwarded on to a housing association that would soon offer him (and his family) permanent housing. This is globalism's replacement population programme for Europe. This is why the only people having large families in the UK nowadays are migrants - because all the incentives and infrastructure is laid out on offer to them. This is why you only ever see white people sleeping on the streets.
 

Radis Noir

Active Member
Migrants are housed on their day of arrival in the UK. They are given monetary benefits then forwarded for permanent housing onto housing associations who favour them over white people (who would never make the points because of the colour of their skin).

Migrants are given priority in housing. This free housing and money incentivises them to have large families as they know there is a 'higher hand' taking great care of them - providing regular free money, free school education and free health care. They also have more rights than white people as they are seen as victims that must be afforded special 'victim status'. Laws exist also for migrants and ethnic minorities to be given jobs, if they so choose, at the expense of white people.

This is identity politics in action. Migrants at the top of the favouritism list, whites down at the bottom.
So the answer is still 'no, I can't.' That's good, I'm glad that we've managed to disprove some of your racist nonsense.
 
If this man was a Muslim migrant (notice how migrants are usually Muslim) he would instantly be given a roof over his head in a b&b or hotel, then he'd be forwarded on to a housing association that would soon offer him (and his family) permanent housing. This is globalism's replacement population programme for Europe. This is why the only people having large families in the UK nowadays are migrants - because all the incentives and infrastructure is laid out on offer to them. This is why you only ever see white people sleeping on the streets.
This is what happens when your country is under occupation by a hostile transnational elite who not only hates your religion and it's founder but your very race and ethnicity and wants you extinct. Muslims and other 'minorities' including gays and soon officially paedophiles, and of course the self-hating leftist and liberal traitors as you see in the post above this, are their battalions against us.
 
Last edited:

reelfountain

Well-Known Member
This is what happens when your country is under occupation by a hostile transnational group who not only hates your religion and it's founder but your very race and ethnicity and wants you extinct. Muslims and other 'minorities' including gays and soon officially paedophiles, and of course the self-hating leftist and liberal traitors, are their battalions against us.
Spot on. That's why I'm so proud of Morrissey. He's the one public figure in music that has spoken out and aired his opinions loud and clear. That makes him a man of the people.
 

Radis Noir

Active Member
This is what happens when your country is under occupation by a hostile transnational elite who not only hates your religion and it's founder but your very race and ethnicity and wants you extinct. Muslims and other 'minorities' including gays and soon officially paedophiles, and of course the self-hating leftist and liberal traitors as you see in the post above this, are their battalions against us.
My country isn't under occupation by anyone. Of course, I can't speak for your country but mine certainly isn't.
Now, isn't it time your went back to your village? I hear they are badly missing their idiot.
 
T

The Ayatollah

Guest
My country isn't under occupation by anyone. Of course, I can't speak for your country but mine certainly isn't.
Now, isn't it time your went back to your village? I hear they are badly missing their idiot.

I'm confident that I can speak for Village Smiths, HowIForgotMyName, and ReelFountain when I say that, once upon a time - maybe not that long ago - we too would have considered the idea of our homeland and our whole civilisation being under parasitic occupation a ridiculous one too.

Believe me, it's no fun becoming aware that it'd be ridiculous to think anything other than that. I don't know about the other lads, but I really really do not want to have to believe it. Yet, having learned what I've learned, I have no choice.

At one time, we agreed with you. What changed? What did we see? Go away and reflect on that.
 
My country isn't under occupation by anyone. Of course, I can't speak for your country but mine certainly isn't.
Now, isn't it time your went back to your village? I hear they are badly missing their idiot.
'Your country' to give away if indeed you are a Briton. Observing the current level of mass immigration by whatever means possible and under whatever name it is given from time to time, incited and arranged by a hostile foreign ruling elite who controls our borders and politicians, Britain will be minority indigenous in just a few decades. More of the 3rd world entered our shores just under Theresa May than any people since the Norman invasion of 1066. And your hatred for our own people is noted in your characterisation of our ancient villages as a home for idiots. Rather it is you cosmopolitan globalists who are the idiots, slaves of your hedonistic passions and the latest tech created to ultimatly destroy you. You are just one mind-controlled soldier among the battalions of the enemy within, an enemy who will ultimatly kill useless leftist idiots like you first when their brutal rule is finally established for all to see. Just as they did in the Bolshevik revolution.


 
Top Bottom