Billy Bragg: long statement re: Morrissey on Facebook (7 July, 2019)




"Last Sunday, while much of the British media were lauding Stormzy’s Glastonbury headline show as epoch defining, Morrissey posted a white supremacist video on his website, accompanied by the comment ‘Nothing But Blue Skies for Stormzy...The Gallows for Morrissey’. The nine minute clip lifted footage from the grime star’s Pyramid Stage performance while arguing that the British establishment are using him to promote multiculturalism at the expense of white culture.

The YouTube channel of the video’s author contains other clips expressing , among other things, homophobia, racism and misogyny - left wing women of colour are a favourite target for his ire. There are also clips expounding the Great Replacement Theory, a far right conspiracy trope which holds that there is a plot of obliterate the white populations of Europe and North America through mass immigration and cultural warfare.

My first thought was to wonder what kind of websites Morrissey must be trawling in order to be able to find and repost this clip on the same day that it appeared online? I came home from Glastonbury expecting to see some angry responses to his endorsement of white supremacism. Instead, the NME published an interview with Brandon Flowers in which the Killers lead singer proclaimed that Morrissey was still “a king”, despite being in what Flowers recognised was “hot water” over his bigoted comments.

As the week progressed, I kept waiting for some reaction to the white supremacist video, yet none was forthcoming. Every time I googled Morrissey, up would pop another article from a music website echoing the NME’s original headline: ‘The Killers Brandon Flowers on Morrissey: ‘He’s Still A King’. I’m well aware from personal experience how easy it is for an artist to find something you’ve said in the context of a longer discourse turned into an inflammatory headline that doesn’t reflect your genuine views on the subject at hand, but I have to wonder if Flowers really understands the ramifications of Morrissey’s expressions of support for the far right For Britain Party?

As the writer of the powerful Killers song ‘Land of the Free’, does he know that For Britain wants to build the kind of barriers to immigration that Flowers condemns in that lyric?
Party leader Anne Marie Walters maintains ties with Generation Identity, the group who both inspired and received funds from the gunman who murdered 50 worshippers at a Christchurch mosque. How does that sit with the condemnation of mass murder by lone gunman in ‘Land of the Free’?

As an explicitly anti-Muslim party, For Britain opposes the religious slaughter of animals without the use of a stun gun, a policy that has given Morrissey a fig leaf of respectability, allowing him to claim he supports them on animal welfare grounds. Yet if that is his primary concern, why does he not support the UK’s Animal Welfare Party, which stood candidates in the recent European elections?

Among their policies, the AWF also aim to prohibit non-stun slaughter. If his only interest was to end this practice, he could have achieved this without the taint of Islamophobia by endorsing them. They are a tiny party, but Morrissey’s vocal support would have given the animal rights movement a huge boost of publicity ahead of the polls.

Instead, he expresses support for anti-Muslim provocateurs, posts white supremacist videos and, when challenged, clutches his pearls and cries “Infamy, infamy, they’ve all got it in for me”. His recent claim that “as a so-called entertainer, I have no rights” is a ridiculous position made all the more troubling by the fact that it is a common trope among right-wing reactionaries.

The notion that certain individuals are not allowed to say certain things is spurious, not least because it is most often invoked after they’ve made their offensive comments. Look closely at their claims and you’ll find that what they are actually complaining about is the fact that they have been challenged.

The concept of freedom pushed by the new generation of free speech warriors maintains that the individual has the right to say whatever they want, whenever they want, to whoever they want, with no comeback. If that is the definition of freedom, then one need look no further than Donald Trump’s Twitter feed as our generation’s beacon of liberty. Perhaps Lady Liberty should be replaced in New York Harbour with a colossal sculpture of the Donald, wearing a toga, holding a gaslight.

Worryingly, Morrissey’s reaction to being challenged over his support of For Britain, his willingness to double down rather than apologise for any offence caused, suggests a commitment to a bigotry that tarnishes his persona as the champion of the outsider. Where once he offered solace to the victims of a cruel and unjust world, he now seems to have joined the bullies waiting outside the school gates.

As an activist, I’m appalled by this transformation, but as a Smiths fan, I’m heartbroken.

It was Johnny Marr’s amazing guitar that drew me to the band, but I grasped that Morrissey was an exceptional lyricist when I heard ‘Reel Around the Fountain’. Ironically, it was a line that he had stolen that won my affections. “I dreamt about you last night and I fell out of bed twice” is spoken by Jimmy, the black sailor, to his white teenage lover, Jo, in Sheila Delaney’s play ‘A Taste of Honey’.

The 1961 movie, starring Rita Tushingham was an early example of a post-war British society that would embrace multi-racial relationships (and homosexuality too). By pilfering that particular line for the song, Morrissey was placing the Smiths in the great tradition of northern working class culture that may have been in the gutter, but was looking at the stars. Yet, by posting a white supremacist video in which he is quoted as saying “Everyone prefers their own race”, Morrissey undermines that line, erasing Jo and Jimmy and all those misfit lovers to whom the Smiths once gave so much encouragement.

A week has passed since the video appeared on Morrissey’s website and nothing has been written in the media to challenge his position. Today it was reported that research by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a UK based anti-extremist organisation, reveals that the Great Replacement Theory is being promoted so effectively by the far right that it is entering mainstream political discourse.

That Morrissey is helping to spread this idea - which inspired the Christchurch mosque murderer - is beyond doubt. Those who claim that this has no relevance to his stature as an artist should ask themselves if, by demanding that we separate the singer from the song, they too are helping to propagate this racist creed."


Regards,
FWD.

172730_10150091526872471_8291732_o.jpg



Media coverage:
Related items:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I want to know how he got rich because I have never seen a Billy Bragg record in my life and when records stores existed I used to spend time in them.
I’m afraid I bring you bad tidings: I would say Morrissey is a peerless lyricist but Billy Bragg prohibits this. He’s a brilliant songwriter. Obviously one might have to wrestle with separating the singer from the song and so on.
 
Yet you can somehow enjoy the three "masterpiece" blogposts that the failed comedian so generously refers to as "articles"?

I like how you keep using "failed comedian" as an insult when maybe 1 in 10,000 comedians actually "make it" in comedy. You're just a nobody who has never even tried to do anything remotely interesting.

And that is why no one will remember your name.
 
I like how you keep using "failed comedian" as an insult when maybe 1 in 10,000 comedians actually "make it" in comedy. You're just a nobody who has never even tried to do anything remotely interesting.

And that is why no one will remember your name.
Strike a nerve, snowflake?
 
People like Billy Bragg love Muslims, thinking they are the poor urban dispossessed who need his help, whereas urban Muslims hate these condescending white boy liberals and would gladly kick his skinny arse and set the kaffir alight laughing as he flailed about in flames.

Muslims are very socially conservative people, more in line with Anne Widdecomb or Norman Tebbit- they despise the left and it's virtue signallers.

But Bragg doesn't know this, because to him Thatcher's still in and there's gangs of skinheads drinking in pubs in Hackney and voting NF and the Nazi menace must be smashed.

Too much country living in his Dorset mansion. He's delusional - whereas Morrissey is always spot-on and intuitive with what's going on in the real world. Which is pretty remarkable for a poet.
Spot on! :thumb:
 
It's funny that when Morrissey does an interview, the news media will cherry pick what they feel are the most damaging lines and present them out of context.

However, when Billy Bragg writes a Facebook post condemning Morrissey, they print the whole thing unedited.

https://www.stereogum.com/2050297/billy-bragg-morrissey-brandon-flowers/wheres-the-beef/

Taking a quote "out of context" can definitely change the meaning. But it has become a cheap and lazy excuse used by far too many people. People don't even know what it means most of the time when they say it.

Name one out of context statement by Morrissey where reading the entire interview changes the meaning.
"Where were the parents" might be a good one but then when we read the whole statement, the one he said he didn't make and which was then posted online in audio form, we find that not only does he blame the parents but also the kid.
"Worse things happen every day at KFC?"
Let's see...
He told a Warsaw audience on July 24, "We all live in a murderous world, as the events in Norway have shown, with 97 dead. Though that is nothing compared to what happens in McDonald's and Kentucky Fried S**t every day."

A few days later he "clarified" with this.
Morrissey issued a statement Thursday to expand on his point, "The comment I made on stage at Warsaw could be further explained this way: Millions of beings are routinely murdered every single day in order to fund profits for McDonalds and KFCruelty, but because these murders are protected by laws, we are asked to feel indifferent about the killings, and to not even question them."

Standing firmly by his statements, the animal activist continued, "If you quite rightly feel horrified at the Norway kilings, then it surely naturally follows that you feel horror at the murder of ANY innocent being. You cannot ignore animal suffering simply because animals 'are not us.'"

Oh okay, so the killings of 97 students is "nothing" and here's why. Still nothing of "what I said was insensitive to those parents and loved ones of those who died in the massacre and I regret saying it was 'nothing' but here's why I said it."
More like, "This statement seems to have gotten some attention so I'll repeat it to a larger audience and make sure everyone knows I said it and also here's some PETA propaganda."

Please, find one statement by Morrissey that was "taken out of context" where the context would make a reasonable person see it in a different light.
 
Mr Bragg opens himself up for criticism,if he connects AMW-GI-Auckland mass murders then why does he not see the link of Labour-IRA-PLO-HAMAS-etc who have been involved in 10,000s of deaths?l genuinely don't understand the whole "holier than thou "self righteous of Mr Bragg when the political party he supports actively supports rubs shoulders with Mr Corbyns friends who believe religious murders are justified and that the eradication of Israel is a noble aim.
 
Taking a quote "out of context" can definitely change the meaning. But it has become a cheap and lazy excuse used by far too many people. People don't even know what it means most of the time when they say it.

Name one out of context statement by Morrissey where reading the entire interview changes the meaning.
"Where were the parents" might be a good one but then when we read the whole statement, the one he said he didn't make and which was then posted online in audio form, we find that not only does he blame the parents but also the kid.
"Worse things happen every day at KFC?"
Let's see...
He told a Warsaw audience on July 24, "We all live in a murderous world, as the events in Norway have shown, with 97 dead. Though that is nothing compared to what happens in McDonald's and Kentucky Fried S**t every day."

A few days later he "clarified" with this.
Morrissey issued a statement Thursday to expand on his point, "The comment I made on stage at Warsaw could be further explained this way: Millions of beings are routinely murdered every single day in order to fund profits for McDonalds and KFCruelty, but because these murders are protected by laws, we are asked to feel indifferent about the killings, and to not even question them."

Standing firmly by his statements, the animal activist continued, "If you quite rightly feel horrified at the Norway kilings, then it surely naturally follows that you feel horror at the murder of ANY innocent being. You cannot ignore animal suffering simply because animals 'are not us.'"

Oh okay, so the killings of 97 students is "nothing" and here's why. Still nothing of "what I said was insensitive to those parents and loved ones of those who died in the massacre and I regret saying it was 'nothing' but here's why I said it."
More like, "This statement seems to have gotten some attention so I'll repeat it to a larger audience and make sure everyone knows I said it and also here's some PETA propaganda."

Please, find one statement by Morrissey that was "taken out of context" where the context would make a reasonable person see it in a different light.
You’re taking it out of context by refusing to concede that someone can legitimately compare the murder of humans to the wholesale slaughter of animals. It’s the politics of dare not question the “holy narrative”, ie the official, authoritative one and anybody who does is a heathen, a nazi, an anti-Semite, a sexist, a homophobe, a racist, etc.... might as well just call them a witch and burn them at the stake.
 
I guess you know who’s talking there?! It’s Marcel de Graaff - member of the right wing populism Partij voor de Vrijheid.
So what he’s doing there is populism.

Have a read: "The Global Compact reaffirms the sovereign right of States to determine their national migration policy and their prerogative to govern migration within their jurisdiction, in conformity with international law. Within their sovereign jurisdiction, States may distinguish between regular and irregular migration status, including as they determine their legislative and policy measures for the implementation of the Global Compact, taking into account different national realities, policies, priorities and requirements for entry, residence and work, in accordance with international law.

Wake up. Merkel won't even wave her own nation's flag. She's the chancellor of Germany ffs.

 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom