Banned Members "Amnesty"

Paris Hilton

Completely Loser
PARIS!!! They leave rags in you there!!!!

But they said it was my fault! That it was an old tampon that got lost up there! Are you saying they did that?!?!?!? They made me pay again to have it removed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm telling Daddy.
 

Paris Hilton

Completely Loser
ive always defended you Paris :o especially when people here talked about raping you :mad:
it was an honor to be banned attempting to defend your honor :blushing:


Thank you, Robert, but don't let them provoke you. I think we should revive the games threads, don't you?!
 

Cassius

New Member
But they said it was my fault! That it was an old tampon that got lost up there! Are you saying they did that?!?!?!? They made me pay again to have it removed!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm telling Daddy.

Girl you should. You could probably get some ribs removed for free or summin.
 
It would be cool if she would be friends with Britney again.

idhx6x.jpg


xbzolt.jpg


15q2ebm.jpg



:flowers:
 

Theo

Active Member
If they didn't do it when I called for a Christmas amnesty in the thread Christmas Amnesty for the Banned SoLowers , I doubt they'll do it now. You expect those no-Christmas-spirit-having motherf***ers to get soft now? Ah well, at least that thread was where I made my peace with Robby. :)


EDIT: This should not be construed as disapproval of NRITH's ban (some people think I automatically oppose everything the mods do, and that's not true). I'm sorry NRITH's banned as I like to read his posts. And I have no idea how long his ban should be as I don't know his full criminal record. But he knew what he was doing. I think he wanted to be banned to build his rep up more, but didn't know he could potentially face a year-long ban (which, on the Internet, must feel like a life sentence). While there's confusion about some of the rules, it was made very clear that Mr. Tseng doesn't abide hardcore porn pics on his site, even in the 'Sty. So, people are lying when they act like that was part of the confusion over the rules.

I know the powers that be will will cast this thread aside, but in light of the recent bannings/exclusion orders and the like. Should there not be an amnesty for the members who have suffered the shame of being banned? I mean not so long ago Greater Manchester Police had an amnesty on guns and the Metropolitan Police had a similar tactic on knives. So should all the banished, oh my god it's gobby apart:lbf: be offered redemtion so we can all be friends again?:popcorn:
 
Last edited:

vicarinatutugal

can't reMember
Not true. As you know very well, Hugh (Morrissey the 23rd) had no record and quickly was given a long time ban. He didn't break TOS. He poked fun of a deserving few. Lies can be made up but the mods and PinnochioT know the truth. Fairness, equality and the truth were never high priorities here.

'There are two types of lies, lies with short legs and lies with long noses. Yours... happen to have long noses.'

*yawn* and double *yawn*

everything I said was correct.
 

Chico

found found found
... While there's confusion about some of the rules, it was made very clear that Mr. Tseng doesn't abide hardcore porn pics on his site, even in the 'Sty. So, people are lying when they act like that was part of the confusion over the rules.


Well, therein lies the issue, Theo. I don't believe that was hardcore porn. I don't believe that pic was porn at all.

The definition of porn is:

Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.


That picture was obviously not intended to cause any type of sexual arousal so....
Was the picture inappropriate?. Of course. But inappropriate things are talked about in the forums and especially the pigsty all the time. If the intent is to shield minors from innappropriate content, banning NRITH is not going to do that. For god's sake, Robby goes into detail about his strange and disgusting masturbation rituals....
If it were my kid, I'd rather have them look at a genital curiousity rather than reading about Robby jacking off into a condom.

So anyway...you're obviously just trying to be controversial with this new I'm all about the mods attitude but....it's already tired.
 

vicarinatutugal

can't reMember
Well, therein lies the issue, Theo. I don't believe that was hardcore porn. I don't believe that pic was porn at all.

The definition of porn is:

Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.


That picture was obviously not intended to cause any type of sexual arousal so....
Was the picture inappropriate?. Of course. But inappropriate things are talked about in the forums and especially the pigsty all the time. If the intent is to shield minors from innappropriate content, banning NRITH is not going to do that. For god's sake, Robby goes into detail about his strange and disgusting masturbation rituals....
If it were my kid, I'd rather have them look at a genital curiousity rather than reading about Robby jacking off into a condom.

So anyway...you're obviously just trying to be controversial with this new I'm all about the mods attitude but....it's already tired.


Oh it totally was not porn.
 

anon x

New Member
Not true. As you know very well, Hugh (Morrissey the 23rd) had no record and quickly was given a long time ban. He didn't break TOS. He poked fun of a deserving few. Lies can be made up but the mods and PinnochioT know the truth. Fairness, equality and the truth were never high priorities here.

'There are two types of lies, lies with short legs and lies with long noses. Yours... happen to have long noses.'

Oh oh,it's starting AGAIN.

FABULOUS !!! :p
 
Tags
britney dave is love daveinaskirt ho hum paris
Top Bottom