ZOOM FROM GLOOM
we’re here, and it’s now. So ….
I think you are right...but who will tell that story? Those closest to him rarely say a word.
What story?
What’s to be told ? what can possibly be revealed that Morrissey himself dare not say ?
I just don’t know what people are imagining that he’s ‘hiding’ or what they think will actually be revealed after his passing.
In Morrissey’s autobiography, the way he describes himself and his life, could work as a good first-hand source. But professor of English studies,
Juan Pellicer, argues that when Morrissey wrote his autobiography, he was taken over by the myth, that he had created about himself, and therefore we cannot use it, as a correct source, he told me. What do you think? Could it be something like this?
What ‘myth’ ? Did you ask this professor?
I don't think he did create a myth about himself - what you're getting is the way he feels about things he remembers. So it's more about his inner life than external facts. Some things would need fleshed out, but it's a good source.
He keeps an archive so that'll make things clearer, if it reaches the public.
I really don’t know how the word ‘myth’ is being used by this professor. Maybe he means ‘image’ ? but who doesn’t create an image or have an image of themselves that usually ends up being false more or less? No one’s perfect.
This sums it up pretty succinctly. How he experienced it is accurate. How some events actually transpired - or what the truth is about another party he writes about - is probably subject to debate.
In my opinion, the title is a bit of a misnomer to begin with. Some parts I'd classify as memoir - which is typically more stylistic than a rehashing of facts - and much of the later part of the book is a sort of travelogue with a timeline that skews from a linear chronology.
Agree.