personally, i too, would prefer him to remain in prison, but i have difficulty with your way of looking at it. it sounds like crude, deductive reasoning: serial killers are irredeemably "evil" and must forever be detained for the safety of others; peter sutcliffe is a serial killer; therefore...
really, i was only joking. much of what you say is true. i know that women can be quite clever.
the 'frink thread' isn't really helping anyone, though.
the popular view is that notorious killers like peter sutcliffe and ian brady shouldn't ever be released, but it'd be interesting to hear the criteria people use to arrive at that conclusion.
possibly because they're not 'morrissey-esque sentiments'.
morrissey wasn't the first person to realise that sex, gender and sexuality are social and cultural phenomena; he was just repeating what he had read in books written by other people.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
i totally rule at the internet.
you people are in my debt.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.