Recent content by HIM

he's rubbish.

personally, i too, would prefer him to remain in prison, but i have difficulty with your way of looking at it. it sounds like crude, deductive reasoning: serial killers are irredeemably "evil" and must forever be detained for the safety of others; peter sutcliffe is a serial killer; therefore...

really, i was only joking. much of what you say is true. i know that women can be quite clever. the 'frink thread' isn't really helping anyone, though.

i suppose that's true, but take a look at the list of people who have replied to that thread. its composition is almost completely female.

the popular view is that notorious killers like peter sutcliffe and ian brady shouldn't ever be released, but it'd be interesting to hear the criteria people use to arrive at that conclusion.

...although, notably, the longest running and most frequently viewed and replied-to thread on this site is...

who are these people?

j.j., is there anything going on in your life? or your head? (can somebody quote me? he's using computer software to ignore me.)

j.j. is a big troublemaker.

no, you're thinking of FOSs.

are you a slag, though?

possibly because they're not 'morrissey-esque sentiments'. morrissey wasn't the first person to realise that sex, gender and sexuality are social and cultural phenomena; he was just repeating what he had read in books written by other people.

good! yes, i'm just about to toddle off up the apples & pears to bedfordshire, prior to which, i'm enjoying a warm, milky drink. goodnight etc.

hallo, young lady. i hope things are, at the very least, quite good with you.

i don't actually think he should've been banned, though.