· NME
· original post
· Morrissey hails unsigned group's frontwoman as 'best British singer in years'
· More News/Media stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt
Morrissey-solo
Archive
|
|
|||||||||
posted by
davidt
on Wednesday October 13 2010, @10:00AM
Link posted by Maurice E in the forums (original post):
Morrissey hails unsigned group's frontwoman as 'best British singer in years' - NME.com Doll & The Kicks tell NME how former Smiths man became their Number One fan
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Morrissey hails Hannah Scanlon of Doll And The Kicks "the best British singer of recent years"
| Top
| 159 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|||||||||
|
Doll and The Kicks. (Score:1, Interesting)
'Doll' from DATK does not have the 'charisma' of which many may speak. Great voice but she can be heard on several occassions to comment on how important it is for their audience to purchase their CD/album.
This is a hallmark of no confidence in the thought 'Doll' does not believe enough in herself or the band, that they will ever be signed up to a record deal.
I enjoyed DATK but they do not quite attract me enough to purchase an album and definitely not to buy a ticket to see a live show.
And of the Albert Hall, well am afraid you play the Albert Hall and forget your shoes? And then to hop about the RAH stage as though it were your bedroom?
No.
Am afraid not.
People are passionate about music and seeing a show live - musicians and artists have to be equally passionate and serious about their presentation.
If not . . . oblivion calls.
Re:Doll and The Kicks. (Score:2, Funny)
(yes I realise you're joking.. so am I... but really, criticising how someone dances is similar level of meanness to mocking their laugh. grow up!)
(User #23727 Info)
Parent
Moz and his L'Pool gals! (Score:1)
(User #12366 Info)
moz (Score:0)
nothing special about them at all
Typical SoLow-ists (Score:2, Insightful)
Compared to the horrors of Kristeen Young, DATK did a fine job and Morrissey praises Hannah. So what? Can't we just leave it at that? Why does every news story have to descend into an orgy of spitefulness? You people need to get a life if this sort of thing makes you feel good about yourselves.
Single file line right here, please (Score:0, Flamebait)
What a bunch of pompous dickheads.
Where's your album, then?
Oh yeah. That's what I thought. You haven't got one.
I, for one, quite like Doll and the Kicks.
I also *GASP* like Kristeen Young.
Spew your venom at yourselves, haters.
It's obviously yourselves that you loathe the most.
(User #22903 Info)
Re:Single file line right here, please (Score:2, Informative)
He's a singer. My favorite singer.
He sings the songs that make me sing along, and that's where it begins and ends.
Ah... And rudeness on the Morrissey solo.
I never thought I'd see the day.
On that note, I'm going out to see some local bands. Perhaps they'll say something to me about my life...
(User #22903 Info)
Parent
Don't hate (Score:2, Interesting)
when they were opening for m i got really bored with them, there songs just sounded the same,
there was nothing distinctively different between the songs at all, and just nothing too the songs in general.
and her voice did nothing for me, it wasn't shit but not the way he's talking.
(User #22638 Info)
this coming from the man who.... (Score:0)
(User #355 Info)
hit it (Score:0, Insightful)
....well (Score:0)
BUT. I honestly think that Doll&Kicks is nothing special. I see too much of other bands and not enough Doll&kicks. I understand, not much room for originality these days, but what sets apart good bands to me, is this: Sure, there will be influences and/or sound-a-likes listening to a band, but the difference between being very great or not is YOUR input as a band to ADD to that. Also in the way you mix around your influences. if you just straight rip off a melody of rhythm, get out. But if you bend an obviously influential riff or melody, turn them inside out and add your flavor on the matter...then fair play to you. You just took and influence and recreated your vision on an influence. And that is something this band does not do, sorry.
-go Pusifer!
Fur coat (Score:1, Informative)
Don't tell me that meat dresses and fur coats are some PETA statement against animal cruelty, because it is not. I have been a vegetarian for 20+ years and would never, ever wear a meat dress or fur coat. It makes me feel as if I have to throw up when I see this. I became a vegetarian because I do not want to eat animals and not because I wanted to impress a celeb. The best statement against eating and wearing animals is by example by living well eating other things and dressing well without animal skin.
Love DATK (Score:2, Insightful)
I see a lot of "mean-spirited" fools (Score:1, Interesting)
I can't think of many others... (Score:0)
DATK Are Brilliant (Score:1, Insightful)
Still play and love their album.Don't listen to some people on this web site.They just wanna slag famous people and bands off just for the sake of it.Even if they are brilliant.
uck! (Score:0, Interesting)
they're a poor man's no doubt....and i'm not a no doubt fan in the first place.
you can see hannah's desperation. she has resorted to wearing skimpy clothing and flirting with the audience because there is nothing original about her and she has no talent.
You All are only jealous (Score:1, Insightful)
Doll and the Kicks are AWESOME!!!
doll and the kicks (Score:0)
Fifty comments (Score:0)
Derivative (Score:0)
Nina Diaz of GIAC (Score:0)
naaah... (Score:0)
(User #23307 Info)
The girl (Score:0)
They are fine. (Score:1)
(User #12253 Info)
Hey! (Score:0)
Have u seen that Hannah from the doll & the Pr (Score:0)
SelFull
Hannah replies. (Score:0)
This is my opinion, if you feel offened by it so much to write an essay on how 'wrong' and judgemental I am, I pity you because you have the clear inability to realise each person has their own view.
And you are nobody to berate such.
Forever young (Score:1, Interesting)
Muzac today is shite
All following badly what went before
We now have regurgitations of tainted love
oh please
irene
An open mind for the support bands (Score:2, Insightful)
Phranc
Sack
Jaguares (well, ok, he opened for them and I recall was pretty well received
Kristeen Young
Girl in a Coma
Red Cortez
Courteeners
Doll and the Kicks
They all write their own music, have singers with a great belt to their voice and sing with their heart & soul, and are powerful performers.
As are all the bands above, Doll and the Kicks are a great bunch and are thankfully not shy with their talent. They are absolutely fun to watch and some of the ballads on special nights have even brought me to tears.
Everyone doesn't have to like them or hate them just because of this article or others who've already made up their minds. But I would suggest that if you haven't seen them yet, give them a chance and check them out for yourself.
Cheers,
(User #2891 Info)
Me fink dat him not right (Score:0)
Siouxsie Sioux voice (Score:1)
(User #615 Info)
I Love DATK !! (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #11218 Info)
What? (Score:1)
Either that or that DATK bird has nicked Moz's wheels and won't give em back until he's praised her.
(User #21338 Info)
doll and the kicks (Score:1)
(User #20817 Info)
rotten tomatos (Score:0)
Re:Pork and apple! (Score:0)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkejnDpjdEs
Parent
Re:i love them (Score:0)
'POP Socks, no shoes and hot pants'
were very attractive at the RAH.
No true 'Punk - ess' would wear - 'POP Socks'.
Parent
Re:i love them (Score:0)
Parent
Re:i love them (Score:1, Insightful)
It's really presumptous (and self-defeating, really) to read into other ppl's thoughts, emotions and reactions etc. Even if you know them very well.
A few examples of scenarios you probably haven't yet considered but are perfectly possible alternatives to your "She gave me evils!' might be:
-She was daydreaming, and thinking about a time when she was angry/pissed off at something, and looked at you. This happens to me quite alot, and I have frequent afterthoughts along the lines of "Oh, I hope that stranger didn't think I was scowling at THEM!"
-(using a more text book psychological instance) you reminded her very literally of someone who was bad to her in her past, and she reacted to that memory
-she was in physical pain with a migraine, flu, an injury etc, which leads to the wider point of, you might have misinterpreted her look;
It's not unusual for me to not know whether someone is laughing or crying, if they have an ambiguous laugh/cry. I'm not autistic, I'd say I'm very sensitive to the moods of others, and I have a very great interest in human emotion etc. To say "I know that's an arrogant look" about someone you don't know, is silly- in fact it's arrogant (hah! projection) because you simply don't know that. That might be how their face NATURALLY is! That might be their thinking face. That might be their "Oh fudge, I've just started my period and I hope no one is watching" face.
It's my life ambition to give up on trying to attribute my own thoughts and ideas to other ppl. It's a big task, but to the degree that I've succeeded, I've become more peaceful. And truthful/accurate. And insightful (into my own thought processes, if not the possible thought processes of others).
The 'daddy's girl' comment is more obviously loaded (and really- is it not received wisdom that sons love their mums and daughters love their dads? Is that really what you want to pick on?) what exactly are you gleaning that observation from? Do you know the woman well? Are you friends with her family? Have you read her journal?
If the answer to those is no, then you're very definitely in the realms of projection and transference. Join the club, for so is the rest of our species
What I'm saying is- use your reason. Break down and deconstruct your own thoughts. You can't know she was thinking arrogant/bitchy thoughts about you. If she was, the reason was surely to do with her own 'shit' and not about you personally. Do you literally think she is having thoughts along the lines of "I am superior to you, I dislike you", and expressing them facially at you? If you go that far with your thinking, then fair enough thats one theory; and even that can have its sting taken out of it by remembering that all such arrogance is based on deep insecurity (and I believe all humans have that. Would you agree?). If you don't go that far, then use your will power to stop the thought that you were sleighted. I'm sure its not a pleasant thought. There's a good, and logical chance that it's not true, also.
Pardon me for writing such a long post dissecting your short post, but I very strongly believe that what you wrote demonstrates the unhappy consequences of unexamined thinking, and I strongly believe there's an alternative to being a slave to one's (pessimistic) thoughts.
Parent
Re:i love them (Score:2, Interesting)
They are in positive transference, you are in negative transference.
The difference is that positive transference doens't affect your quality of life (unless you're being convinced to do something that's not in your best interests), and negative transference causes 'bad feelings'. Feeling singled out, aggrieved, humiliated, controlled, etc.
I'm sorry if that sounds like textbook psychology, but if it does, it only does so in the same way that a physics textbook sounds like real physics.
I just choose to talk to you in a grown up way rather than insulting you. If you don't like me dropping in psychological terms (although they're VERY relevant to this, in my oppinion) then ignore those, and concentrate on the non-psychological content of my replies, like on how it's impossible for a person to 100% know for certain what another person is thinking.
Unless you claim telepathy as one of your skills? In which case I'll back down and let you off the hook.
(User #23727 Info)
Parent
Re:i love them (Score:2, Interesting)
I just object to what you just said, that I should shut up because I don't know what I'm talking about, when there's a very good chance (as evidenced by the quality and content of our respective posts) that I DO know what I'm talking about, or at least, know as much as you do, and possibly, more.
That kind of messy, lazy implication is the sort of thing that pisses me off. That's why I've been replying to you, to try to straighten out your messy and lazy thoughts that you've been expressing "She gave me a bad look, ergo she is an awful person" etc
(User #23727 Info)
Parent
Re:Pork and apple! (Score:0)
Parent