· Uncleskinny
· The Smiths - The Cowbell/Click Track
· Aly Panic
· www.bbc.co.uk/6music
· More News/Media stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt
Morrissey-solo
Archive
|
|
|||||||||
posted by
davidt
on Monday November 28 2005, @10:00AM
Uncleskinny writes:
Mike Joyce was on BBC Radio 6 (6Music) tonight, and he was plugging the fact he was selling all his rare Smiths stuff on Ebay. As a taster, he played this song, which he called the Click Track, but which Simon Goddard named the Cowbell Track. ---Uncleskinny has also provided the clip for download here: The Smiths - The Cowbell/Click Track (mp3, 1.6MB). --- Jazzy Jeff also writes: Mike Joyce is selling some unheard Smiths material on eBay, with auction(s) starting on Monday 28th November. Joyce announced his plans on Marc Riley's Mint programme on BBC Radio 6 on Sunday night. Joyce revealed that, due to financial problems, he also had to sell old Smiths records to record shops in the 90's. He claims that one item may attract bids of up to £1,000. This remains to be seen, as many fans on the Morrissey-solo messageboard were clearly furious with the ex-drummer's decisions. ---Aly Panic also writes: Mike Joyce appeared on the Mark Riley show on BBC6 Music tonight where they played the "Click Track", an unreleased instrumental.
If you missed it you can listen to the show again at www.bbc.co.uk/6music
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Mike Joyce on BBC Radio 6, mentions "The Click Track" (clip), selling rare Smiths on eBay
| Top
| 151 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|||||||||
|
why sign them? (Score:3, Insightful)
why mike why?
Re:why sign them? (Score:3, Funny)
(User #36 Info)
Parent
It doesn't give a link to the ebay stuff but (Score:3, Informative)
http://search.ebay.co.uk/_W0QQsassZriseupandkillQ
Click Claptrap (Score:0)
Re:Click Claptrap (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #6367 Info)
Parent
It's a beautiful song (Score:2)
Even in 1 minute and 45 seconds (and without Moz) - the genius of Johnny Marr, Mike Joyce, and Andy Rourke, shine through. Thanks to U. Skinny & company for posting it.
(User #9224 Info)
Re:It's a beautiful song (Score:4, Insightful)
the smiths would have been very different without joyce and rourke. they didn't just roll out the chops of the era. joyce raided 60s pop and 50s rockabily. he had tons of emotional range, playing tired and soft on 'reel around the fountain' and brutal on 'london'. rourke had a signature style, he was a third melodic voice in the group in a way that gary has never been - by comparison moz's band are a bunch of studio presets.
of course you can all say with first hand knowledge that marr told rourke and joyce exactly what to play but anyone who's ever picked up an instrument knows you can't programme 2 guys like robots over 4 albums.
(User #12826 Info)
Parent
how sad (Score:0)
(User #13536 Info)
It makes me think (Score:0, Insightful)
mike joyce sellout (Score:0, Troll)
(User #15055 Info)
Re:mike joyce sellout (Score:2, Funny)
(User #12729 Info)
Parent
Financial problems? (Score:4, Interesting)
I feel cheap and dirty after reading this news. What kind of financial problems could cause an ex-Smith to sell his soul? Maybe I am being dramatic, but please read on.
I feel that Mike Joyce may be a desperate individual to sell away memorabilia. I can't understand what type of financial problems he could possibly have. At what point does one "settle down"- ? I feel that this ebay snafu is a last ditch effort to score cash, and that is sad. The Smiths created a legacy, and now it is commercially for sale. I am just so glad that The Gap and Abercrombie are not playing Smiths' tunes. I think I would die instantly.
Mike Joyce is very talented and this type of behavior signals deeper issues. I respect him completely but ebay is only suitable for charity or other related causes.
Maybe I am naive or dumb, but I can't understand how bad off he could possibly be.
Sincerely,
Ken S.
(User #3940 Info)
You are all blind (Score:2, Funny)
(User #10663 Info)
The Smiths without "Mozzer"... (Score:0, Troll)
Lots of people can play the music. No one else can really sing the songs.
(User #10290 Info)
Maybe (Score:2, Insightful)
It does make you realise that Mike really does want to fleece the memory of The Smiths for all it's worth, i wonder if he has any strong emotional attachment at all, or just wants to buy a new BMW.
(User #13344 Info)
What a Track (Score:0, Flamebait)
(User #151 Info)
What's the big deal? (Score:4, Insightful)
And regard the slagging off he, Andy Rourke and Craig Gannon seem to get on this site, Mike Joyce has always been a pleasure to speak to and always happy to sign records, chat about the old days and talk about the music - he doesn't bitch or whinge and I have never heard him talk out of turn about Morrissey.
He also had a hand in making some of the greatest pop records ever, but I guess that counts for nothing these days.
If he is making a bit of tax free cash on the side, courtesy of ebay, then good luck to him.
(User #14426 Info)
Theres no mistaking...... (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #13345 Info)
Re:Theres no mistaking...... (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #12046 Info)
Parent
Re:Theres no mistaking...... (Score:3, Insightful)
What the Hell has Mike Joyce flogging stuff on ebay got to do with having a go at Morrissey anyway? I'd suggest that sending Morrissey a pork chop through the post would have upset him far more than flogging a few personal items on ebay. Utter nonsense.
(User #12046 Info)
Parent
I really hope (Score:2, Interesting)
(User #12046 Info)
Greed (Score:0, Redundant)
You needed everything
You wanted everything
You needed everything
Everything is...
Everything is...
Greed
(User #7846 Info)
sly comment from riley (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #12826 Info)
What's the Big Deal? (Score:1, Insightful)
If he is broke, it is his business, but I imagine he just doesn't give a damn about this stuff anymore.
If that were the case, it would be more admirable, if he sold this stuff and gave the money to charity, but he is under no obligation to do so, anymore than you or I, if we sell items on eBay. He owns this stuff, so he can sell it.
I think you guys are over dramatizing this, like everything else on this site. Get a grip.
Besides, who wants to buy a test pressing signed by Mike Joyce, or an old tour programme??? Who cares.....?
The way I see it, mike Joyce is not going to get rich selling this garbage.
BBC or QVC? (Score:2, Interesting)
(User #13603 Info)
Well, the royalties (Score:3, Funny)
(User #14157 Info)
Box Set (Score:0)
New/Old Smiths Track (Score:1)
(User #13051 Info)
I don't dislike Mike Joyce (Score:2, Insightful)
(User #4730 Info)
Brilliant. (Score:1)
(User #14330 Info)
Dreadful track (Score:1)
(User #14697 Info)
I'll tell you what Joyce's problem is... (Score:1, Interesting)
Rupert Pupkin! (Score:2, Insightful)
I've always been a Moz-solo fanatic -- I regard The Smiths as the timeless band Morrissey was in before he went out on his own, but my heart lies with his solo records. So, I'm quite objective about Da Smiths and the court case, etc.
Originally I thought Joyce was after a quarter of recording royalties, which is just stone madness. When I learned he was after 25% of the live performance royalties, I still thought he didn't deserve it but in the absence of a paper agreement regarding the split on said profits, it's not that strange for him to take it to court, and not his intention to sully the legacy of The Smiths, I don't think. Marr was uncomfortable and just wanted to get it out the way, but Morrissey being the brilliant iconoclast he is, just can't let it go that easily. Basically it's a very public spat about a backroom issue.
I think it disturbs people that Joyce is able to, on one hand, speak cheerfully about how good the days in The Smiths were and still have respect for Morrissey as an artist, and on the other fight tooth and nail for what he believes his his. I don't think it's an impossible dichotomy, but he seems like a simple guy (take that how you want) who's still owed a fiver from an old friend and won't let it go in the name of the good ole days.
(User #80 Info)
Parent
johnny marr "hasn't got too much money" (Score:0)
http://www.manchesteronline.co.uk/news/s/132/1325
My Great(ish) Idea for "Click Track..." (Score:2, Interesting)
2) Hold a contest to see who can add the best Morrisseyesque lyrics/vocals to the track
3) Hold a simultaneous contest for the single's sleeve design
3) Sell the track and tie in the profits(?) with the charity that Andy Rourke's event is supporting
I think I'd stand a pretty good chance, boys.
(User #80 Info)
Win? :My Great(ish) Idea for "Click Track..." (Score:2, Funny)
No way will you win if 'Vinny' enters!
Especially if his designing is as good as his singing!
(User #14277 Info)
Parent
Take it from me (Score:0)
Mike Joyce (Score:0)
First off, I like the fact that Joyce has been selling some of the Smiths rare songs. Does he really need the songs anymore anyway? Besides, this can be referred to as a gift for Smiths fans - he could have kept the track and never let your ears having the pleasure to hear it. Instead, he knows there's many diehards out there who would love to get the opportunity to listen to some of these unreleased takes. Myself included, but I wouldn't pay the money for the tracks.
Speaking of money, why do we all assume that Joyce is making this part up? Who knows what kind of money he and Andy make off of playing with that guy (I can't even remember his name now...I think it's Vinny something)? Does Joyce make everyday headline news? Has he did anything worthwile since the Morrissey days? No, he has not. Also, the man has a family to support.
Even though I'm no Mike Joyce fan (because of the lawsuit), instead of trashing on him like most of you have done, try to think about why he is doing this.
Tha Muthaphukkin' Clizz-nipp (Score:0)
- Man of Vision
I like Mike (Score:1)
I encourage everyone to seek justice through the courts. That's what courts are there for. And that's what Mike Joyce did. It is sad for people to slam him for simply wanting a greedy and dishonest person to pay him what he's owed. It is also sad to constantly read Morrissey's highly spun characterizations of the lawsuit in the press. He knows he has a megaphone of the press and that most of his fans will not look at the actual record of the case.
(User #778 Info)
The latest FACTS (Score:2, Informative)
"Statement from Morrissey
30 November 2005
Statement from Morrissey:
The latest statements from M Joyce on a BBC 6 radio interview as faithfully reported on the MorrisseySoLow site have been brought to my attention and I feel I should make this reply as an attempt to put the matter straight.
1. From '83 to '87 M Joyce happily and willingly received 10% of Smiths recording royalties.
2. In '89, as is documented, Joyce sued Morrissey & Marr for 25% of Smiths recording royalties.
3. In '96, Joyce took his claim to court - and on the basis of the 1890 Partnership Act the judge awarded Joyce 25%.
4. In '97, M Joyce was paid 215 thousand pounds from me, and 215 thousand pounds from Johnny Marr.
5. In '99, Joyce appeared on British television and made the statement: "There was no contract saying we were gonna get 25%."
6. In 2001, as a final payment of back royalties, Johnny Marr paid Joyce 260 thousand pounds, plus "costs." At this time I was in the US and was not served with court proceedings, so Joyce obtained a Default Judgment. He then put forward a claim from me for 688 thousand pounds - well above and beyond the amount Johnny Marr was ordered to pay. In my absence, the figure was not contested.
7. Since 2001, and because of the Default Judgment against me, Joyce has taken out Third Party Orders against the following societies: my personal bank account in England, Smiths royalties from Warner Music, my personal PRS royalties, my personal PPL royalties, and he has attempted to seize UK concert fees from venue to venue. This money, to date, totals 700 thousand pounds. This figure is in addition to the figures mentioned above.
8. By grabbing the full total of Smiths royalties from Warner Music (and this means that when the public buy a Smiths CD in the UK, the royalties go to Joyce, and have done so since 2001) Joyce has knowingly deprived Andy Rourke of his 10% Smiths royalties, and has deprived producers John Porter, Stephen Street, Grant Showbiz and Steve Lillywhite (for "Ask") of their entitlements. Joyce did not declare to the courts that others - namely, the above - were also beneficiaries to the Warner Music royalties.
9. In 2001, Joyce attempted to seize both my mother's house and my sister's house by claiming that I had taken my assets out of the UK; he made this claim even though he had direct access to all of the above – which are in the UK. Joyce eventually dropped both of these claims due to lack of evidence, and he refused to pay the 150 thousand pounds that it had cost me to defend his groundless claims. Joyce also dropped his claim as co-composer with Johnny M on Smiths compositions, and Joyce also dropped his claim for Producer royalties on Smiths recordings, and Joyce also dropped his claim for a share of Artwork payments given to me for providing Smiths record sleeves. There were, in fact, no payments to me for Smiths Artwork. Joyce made a further claim for 25% of all Smiths t-shirts sold during the '83 to '87 period, even though there was no evidence that any royalty for t-shirts had been received by either myself or Johnny Marr.
10. In legal fees alone, Joyce has cost me 600 thousand pounds - this is quite apart from any payments made to him, and is quite apart from any money seized by him. In total, Joyce has cost me 1 million, 515 thousand pounds. This is an approximate figure - it could even be higher.
11. The Joyce action is continuous. Because of his Default Judgment he continues to take my royalties, and the royalties of others mentioned above, from Warner Music - consequently I have not received record royalties since 2001.
12. Since 2001, the money claimed by Joyce is charged, to me, at 100 pounds a day in interest.
13. During the Smiths' lifetime, when Joyce willingly took a 10% royalty, he did not contribute towards any expenses of any kind, did not take on any Partnership duties or responsi
(User #12673 Info)
Hmm (Score:1)
How the hell were we supposed to get our facts right when we knew next to nothing about the details of the case beyond speculation?
I can't believe how much money Joyce has tried to get (and has got!)! Nobody needs that amount. If I hadn't have heard it from the horses' mouth I wouldn't have believed it (although I always take the things Moz says with a pinch of salt!).
Ugh. I hate reading about this case. The whole thing makes me uneasy.
(User #12405 Info | http://www.livejournal.com/users/amysquie)
Simply outraged (Score:1)
(User #14974 Info)
Sounds like.... (Score:0)
(User #13189 Info)
Mr. Joyce... shame on you (Score:0)
This person is out of his mind, what the hell is he doing ?
financial problems my ass (Score:0)
I have a gold record for World Won't Listen that I won at one of the Smith's conventions back in 99 or something like that. It was during a guitar playing contest where you had to play Smiths songs. Go figue. Anyway, the covention people told me they got it from Mike Joyce. I went and had it checked out awhile ago to see if it was worth anything and it turns out that it is most likely a fake. The frame is probably worth more than the record.
Why not? She has to look her best....... (Score:1)
Boning - 'Originally, corsets and bustiers were given their structured form by stitching whale bone or the like into the garment. Now, similar, though less oppressive garments are structured similarly with man-made "bone" as supports. Boning creates a defined waistline and shapely torso'.
(User #14277 Info)
Parent
Well if she insisted (Score:0)
Wait for the revelation on her site, straight from the horses mouth.
Wedding bells?
Parent