Journal of naomi (421)
 Info   Journal   Friends   Fans   Foes   Freaks   
[ Friend's Journals ]
 
Morrissey-solo Login
Nickname:

Password:

Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

naomi (421)
naomi
  (email not shown publicly)

Sunday March 19, 06
01:25 PM - Reader, Beat Author
[ ]
I was moved to pen a grumpy email to The Observer offices this morning. For your amusement:

Subject: OMM 31 - "Papal Attraction"

Douglas Coupland confesses that he managed to hold out for 15 years without deigning to conduct an interview. May I suggest that he not return to attempt another in the near future? Fouling up a Morrissey interview is quite some feat, but he certainly managed it in your last issue. Morrissey can occasionally be glib and unrevealing at interview, it is true, but he's always entertaining, and can be genuinely illuminating given creative questioning. If your interviewer feels that his distinctly commonplace observations about the work - not to mention his hangover - are more worthy of public dissemination than the word of his distinguished interviewee, then he needs his head examining.

All best, etc.


& yes, I do know I'm a pompous idiot, but I actually can't help it...
List all Journal entries
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Reader, Beat Author | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
i was disappointed too (Score:0)
by supposed interview. who wants to know about what coupland thinks, we wanted the interview with morrissey.
Anonymous -- Monday March 20 2006, @12:38AM (#204488)
    Exactly. here is what i just emailed The Obs. Mag. (Score:1)
    Exactly. here is what I just emailed The Obs. Magazine -

    "Re Coupland's piece on Morrissey - how very, very disappointing. To have this piece (for I would only with great reluctance refer to it as an "interview") on the front page of OMM only deceives the reader as to what is inside this edition. Surely this "interview" should have had Morrissey as its subject and not Coupland? "
    YouDidYourBest -- Monday March 20 2006, @11:24AM (#204565)
    (User #15831 Info)


      [ home | submit story/news item | archive/search | past polls | faq | preferences | terms of service | rss ]