> Aaah, first of all, welcome back Somnium! But don't try
> different names, your writing style is too distinctive....
errr, what? I hate to say that, but I'm not the person you think I am.
> And: I don't see much sense in argueing about the artistic value
> of songs like "All for you" because they are spit out
> by some millionaire songwriter for the sole purpose of making
> money. They don't represent the actual state of emotions or
> thoughts of this divorced and openly depressed woman with eating
> disorders who grew up in a golden cage. Don't you think Janet
> Jackson has more things in her life that would be worth writing
> about? Yet she keeps writing unimportant, unimpressionable
> little dance tunes (if she even writes them herself at all).
> Well, you are impressed, obviously.
Not impressed at all. But I'm not supposed to decide what janet must write about. You are making criticism about a 'whole' album, wich I believe, you didn't listen to?
> Well and then.... I don't see how Morrissey, Belle and Sebastian
> and Janet Jackson mingle well in a cd collection,
This has nothing to do with my simple honest note. They are obviously different.
but everyone
> has the right to listen to their own crap. So you keep listening
> to your dance crap,
I don't listen to any dance, my dear. Why are so nervous? I'm not a Janet Jackson enthusiastic, by the way.
I keep listening to my rockabilly crap
> (which at least is honest music).
But still a crap. I just have made a simple criticism, and you, for some reason (God only knows) felt offended by my words. I'm sorry, I will not bother you anymore. I won't even reply any of your posts anymore. But before saying something about an album you didn't listen, please unless search some informations. And stop accusing me for posting on different nick names, I am a fan of Belle & Sebastian, and I thought I could share my points with Morrissey fans, but now I see you are all lunatics.
Ps: Why everyone on this forum is so paranoid?