Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Starbucks' Recycling Fraud

  1. #1

    Default Starbucks' Recycling Fraud

    Waste at Starbucks
    Coating on coffee cups puts lid on recycling

    Monday, September 17, 2007 3:22 AM
    By David Conrad


    THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH

    Starbucks goes through roughly 2.3 billion paper cups a year and touts its national award for using cups made of 10 percent recycled material.
    The sleeves on the cups even plead, "Help us help the planet."
    But don't be confused. Starbucks promotes recycling on its cups, but the cups themselves aren't recyclable here or in most other cities nationwide.
    "Well, they tricked me," said Nicole Mejias, 22, a self-described Starbucks freak. "I immediately associate recycling with Starbucks because of their cups. That's so hypocritical. I would have never guessed" that the cups weren't easily recyclable.
    The reason: The plastic coating that keeps the cup from leaking also prevents it from being recycled with other paper products. That could be overcome, but it would cost more.
    Anything can be recycled, but "The system is not designed to take the individual Starbucks cups," said Steve Sargent, director of recycling for Rumpke Recycling, Columbus' largest recycler.
    Waste Management, North America's largest recycler, won't take the cups, either.
    But many employees have been telling customers otherwise. They say their Seattle-based employer never made the situation clear.
    "I totally thought the cups were recyclable. I think almost everyone did," said Melanie O'Brien, an Otterbein College student studying environmental initiatives who has worked at Starbucks.
    Recently, workers at a Clintonville Starbucks started taking cups to recycling sites themselves, because they felt guilty that they were being thrown away.
    But an employee from the Solid Waste Authority of Central Ohio informed them that their efforts were pointless because recyclers would accept neither their plastic nor paper cups.
    An official with the Ohio Division of Natural Resources commended Starbucks for using recycled materials, but said the company is missing a bigger point.
    "There's a big push for companies to be green nowadays and for all the positive publicity that comes with it," said Chet Chaney from the division's recycling and litter-prevention office.
    Starbucks is picking the "down-hanging fruit" of positive publicity with its cups, he said. "What's most important is that they also look at what happens after the cup is used."
    Cup O' Joe has reusable cups and dishes for customers who are "drinking in" at its eight central Ohio locations. And in the next few weeks, it will switch all of its paper carryout cups to a compostable "ecotainer" made by International Paper.
    Starbucks cups aren't compostable, and the company doesn't offer free reusable cups. But it sells travel mugs and offers a 10-cent discount to customers who bring their own cups.
    Customers in the United States and Canada took that offer more than 17 million times in 2006, saving 674,000 pounds of paper, said Starbucks spokeswoman Valerie Carlborg.
    Starbucks said that a more-recyclable cup wasn't an option, but the cup manufacturer disagreed.
    "It's all about the money; the question is whether they would be willing to pay for it," said Kelvin Okamoto, manager of materials and engineer at SOLO Cup Co., which is based in Illinois.
    Making that change could double the cost of cups, he said, "which means consumers would likely have to pay more, too."
    But a South Side recycler said it could take Starbucks cups "all day long" if people dropped them off.
    "The majority of recyclers take the same products they did 30-40 years ago, instead of finding new places that will take other things, like these cups," said Steve Grossman, president of the Grossman Group Inc., which operates at 2500 Jackson Pike.
    Rumpke said it hasn't searched for other recyclers to handle coffee cups because there hasn't been enough demand.
    "If Starbucks set up a recycling system and could provide us with enough cups to fill a truck, then who knows?" said Sargent. "Not only could we do it, but maybe it would be profitable enough for us to even do it for free."
    "If I knew where good songs came from I'd go there more often." Leonard Cohen
    "
    I’ve always held the song in high regard because songs have got me through so many sinks of dishes..." Leonard Cohen

  2. #2

    Default Re: Starbucks' Recycling Fraud

    This is a non-article by a reporter with nothing better to do. If something says that it's made of recycled material, that in no way implies that it is itself recyclable. Park benches can be made from recycled milk cartons, but nobody believes that the benches can be recycled in the same way.

    If Starbucks drinkers have a problem with the non-recyclability of the cups, then they should either bring their own or make their own damn coffee at home like in the Good Ol' Days when we walked to school 10 miles, barefoot, and uphill...


    Love Morrissey, but hate most Morrissey fans? Then this is the FB group for you.

  3. #3
    Dave
    Guest

    Default Re: Starbucks' Recycling Fraud

    I disagree. These things should be known because then the consumer can voice their opinion. It's about Starbucks image, and the fact that they try to appear progressive, that makes this an interesting article.

Similar Threads

  1. Starbucks=Garbage
    By bogdana in forum Off-topic archive 2007 (read-only)
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: August 19, 2007, 01:50 PM
  2. For the Starbucks patrons: Confessions Of A Starbucks Barista
    By The Seeker of Good Songs in forum Off-topic archive 2007 (read-only)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: June 22, 2007, 10:17 PM
  3. Free Starbucks Next Week
    By The Seeker of Good Songs in forum Off-topic archive 2007 (read-only)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 9, 2007, 01:21 AM
  4. signature fraud ?
    By spekkie2 in forum Marketplace archive (read-only)
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: August 25, 2006, 07:28 PM
  5. I went to Starbucks last night...
    By jc in forum General Discussion archive 2003 (read-only)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 22, 2003, 05:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •