E
Editor, The Economist
Guest
From our April 28th Edition, in news stands now:
(Page 28, paragraph 3)
"The notion that Mr. Bush is an environmental health warning is just plain wrong. His announcement that he was pulling out of the Kyoto accords did not end America's involvement in the treaty. It has been dead ever since the Senate voted 95-0 against the idea in 1997. Mr. Bush has upheld regulations requiring diesel fuel to be cleaned of most of its pollutants. He upheld rules requiring improvements in the energy efficiency of domestic appliances (air conditioners being a small exception)."
I thought this bit of news might prove interesting to environmentally aware Morrissey fans. Good Evening and sleep at peace: your country is in good hands. You are far better off than we are here in London.
(Page 28, paragraph 3)
"The notion that Mr. Bush is an environmental health warning is just plain wrong. His announcement that he was pulling out of the Kyoto accords did not end America's involvement in the treaty. It has been dead ever since the Senate voted 95-0 against the idea in 1997. Mr. Bush has upheld regulations requiring diesel fuel to be cleaned of most of its pollutants. He upheld rules requiring improvements in the energy efficiency of domestic appliances (air conditioners being a small exception)."
I thought this bit of news might prove interesting to environmentally aware Morrissey fans. Good Evening and sleep at peace: your country is in good hands. You are far better off than we are here in London.