You don't have to say you love me, just be close at hand.
Re: You said just last week the ONLY reason you come here is to see Irene's postings about Jews
> It astounds me that someone who just last week posted a thread titled
> "Just checked in to see how Irene was handling the news about
> Sharon" -
> http://www.morrissey-solo.com/discuss/index.cgi?noframes;read=294841 - is
> this week pretending he's stopping by for "intelligent
> discussion" and "deep musical analysis."
Theo, I thought I'd never see the day when I actually agree with every word you say. The only time Nick emerges from his mole hole is to defend anything or everything related to Israel v Palestine. He NEVER really puts up a defence, he just curses anyone who dares question the occupation.
This whole matter of racism/terrorism is so muddled.
Nothing in life is black and white.
You are termed a "Jihad" supporter for questioning the invasion of Iraq.
You are termed a "Nazi" for questioning the Jewish invasion of Palestine.
You are termed a "Racist" for questioning the unlimited immigration policy of your country.
You are termed a "Terrorist" for supporting the Animal Liberation Front.
I have concluded, I am a racist jihad supporter with nazi tendencies who loves animals more than the lot of them.
At least I can come to my own conclusions and have done for years and years and years and years
> There are two message boards on this site. The main boards are the
> comments beneath the news items. This board is more anarchic, halfway
> between a chat room and a message board. If you don't like what you see,
> who cares - it scrolls away into the abyss.
> UncleSkinny posted a message recently when Margaret Thatcher was taken to
> the hospital, stating he hopes she suffers and dies. Is that different
> from Irene's posts about Sharon? I would never say he can't post such a
> thing, but it's always interesting that inflammatory material is
> "okay" so long as it is far left wing. It's also noteworthy that
> no one posted any disrespectful or inhuman things when left wingers were
> mourning MP Tony Bank here. We are better than they are and have a sense
> of decency.
> Instead of this message, you could've easily gifted the board with your
> "deep musical analysis" and set the tone for the entire day.
> Anyway, concerning someone starting a thread about comments made by a pop
> star, the pop star was Morrissey and this is a site about Morrissey.
> People said I was being a "troll" starting a thread about
> Morrissey supporting animal terrorism. Yet a few days later that same
> subject made the newspapers of the world, such as the Australian, whose
> headline was "Pop star backs animal terrorists."
> People could very well have had intelligent discussions about that topic
> and many related sub-topics, or they could've just let my post be and
> click on topics they're interested in. Instead, they chose to troll me,
> and after the topic had fallen way down the list, they chose to troll it
> again to bring it back to the top. That was fun to me - whether it goes
> the "intelligent discussion" route or the trolling me route, I
> win either way...but the choice was theirs. And now you see it scrolls
> down down down again...clearing the path for your deep musical analysis to
> be front and center. However, the Theo van Gogh Martyrs Brigade will be
> back, and if any of the terrorism supporters wanna knife me like they
> knifed Theo, give it your best shot.