The Philosopher is just another zionist hating to leave the house he made on Palestininan land!

  • Thread starter Seriously Flawed not right in the head
  • Start date
S

Seriously Flawed not right in the head

Guest
How sad, maybe next time you should ask for the deeds, i.e, who owned the land in the first place.

Now, go to hell, get back to where you should have stayed in the first place and let those who REALLY own the land live in peace.

OVER AND BY GOD YOU ARE ALL OUT OF THERE SHORTLY....

What happens next? Shoot that marvellous Prime Minister of yours who saw the only way out?.
 
Anyone who criticizes Irene is automatically a Zionist or a Jew.

Or even worse, both!

Haha, I love it. Irene, you are such a f***ing caricature!
 
> How sad, maybe next time you should ask for the deeds, i.e, who owned the
> land in the first place.

> Now, go to hell, get back to where you should have stayed in the first
> place and let those who REALLY own the land live in peace.

> OVER AND BY GOD YOU ARE ALL OUT OF THERE SHORTLY....

> What happens next? Shoot that marvellous Prime Minister of yours who saw
> the only way out?.

Hey i recommend Geography and social justice, by David Smith. A real excellent read.
 
Re: Anyone who criticizes Irene is automatically a Zionist or a Jew.

> Or even worse, both!

> Haha, I love it. Irene, you are such a f***ing caricature!
Ha, She could think you are a child killing, swinging from trees, voodoo worshipping African American jew.
I would be very surprised if she hasn't contacted the Pope yet to try to have me excommunicated.
 
> Hey i recommend Geography and social justice, by David Smith. A real
> excellent read.

History is made by those who write the books though.

What side of the divide did he stand on?
 
Oh should have been "which" side of the divide of course. How lax of me.
 
Oh even worse; It should have "read" not "been" still critical after all these years.
 
> History is made by those who write the books though.

> What side of the divide did he stand on?

Neither. side of the divide it just talks about the differences we have between ourselves and others. Who has the right to ownership of a land and how far back this goes in history. Very interesting and for anyone who has views on this subject food for thought and thought for food.
 
Re: Oh even worse; It should have "read" not "been" still critical after all these years.

Not to worry at long as you don't use z's where there should be s's
 
> Neither. side of the divide it just talks about the differences we have
> between ourselves and others. Who has the right to ownership of a land and
> how far back this goes in history. Very interesting and for anyone who has
> views on this subject food for thought and thought for food.

Well if he is non partisan I'll look this one up.

Normally, we have "good reading" recommended by Theo and we know where that's coming from. Anyway, I'll search for this one.

What did you conclude, after reading?
 
> Well if he is non partisan I'll look this one up.

> Normally, we have "good reading" recommended by Theo and we know
> where that's coming from. Anyway, I'll search for this one.

> What did you conclude, after reading?

I concluded that the if the Isreali argument is that 'we were here thousands of years ago, so we have a right to live here now' then this is seriously flawed (sorry!). Because the 're-claiming' of isreal took place in modern times, post second world war, there claim to the land is weakened. The basis on which the land ws taken 'back' was also very shakey and without much justification, which i guess makes the whole thing unjust.

Personally i think the whole thing is very sad and up-setting. I don't see why they can't live together, however i realise this view is a simplistic one.
 
> I concluded that the if the Isreali argument is that 'we were here
> thousands of years ago, so we have a right to live here now' then this is
> seriously flawed (sorry!). Because the 're-claiming' of isreal took place
> in modern times, post second world war, there claim to the land is
> weakened. The basis on which the land ws taken 'back' was also very shakey
> and without much justification, which i guess makes the whole thing
> unjust.

> Personally i think the whole thing is very sad and up-setting. I don't see
> why they can't live together, however i realise this view is a simplistic
> one.

Well, "please" he sounds like an author after my own heart.

Their argument "stinks" to put it mildly, they never "owned" the land in the first place, it was all down to some parable in the "old testament" which is defunct anyway, proclaiming a land for the "chosen" people. The definition of "chosen" is open to debate also, however, they claim to be, so leave them alone I say.

The sad fact is, they didn't find the "chosen" land on some uninhabited island in the north atlantic, oh no, it happened to be already named "Palestine" inhabited by "Palestinians". They decided to take over this piece of chosen earth from all corners of the globe (i.e if you hold a Jewish identity, the ticket is free)

Yes the top and bottom of the argument has been well written.

They did not belong there, they invaded another's territory, they should have gotten out before they ever got in and now the rest of the world is paying the price.

It sounds a wonderful read.

Thankfully, you can see, it does not mean you are racist to call a spade a spade.

I'm not racist for the sake of being so, honest.

However, Israel should never ever have been named on the map.

It was, and look at the state of the Middle East now.
 
> Well, "please" he sounds like an author after my own heart.

> Their argument "stinks" to put it mildly, they never
> "owned" the land in the first place, it was all down to some
> parable in the "old testament" which is defunct anyway,
> proclaiming a land for the "chosen" people. The definition of
> "chosen" is open to debate also, however, they claim to be, so
> leave them alone I say.

> The sad fact is, they didn't find the "chosen" land on some
> uninhabited island in the north atlantic, oh no, it happened to be already
> named "Palestine" inhabited by "Palestinians". They
> decided to take over this piece of chosen earth from all corners of the
> globe (i.e if you hold a Jewish identity, the ticket is free)

> Yes the top and bottom of the argument has been well written.

> They did not belong there, they invaded another's territory, they should
> have gotten out before they ever got in and now the rest of the world is
> paying the price.

> It sounds a wonderful read.

> Thankfully, you can see, it does not mean you are racist to call a spade a
> spade.

> I'm not racist for the sake of being so, honest.

> However, Israel should never ever have been named on the map.

> It was, and look at the state of the Middle East now.

The book is more theory than anything, and includes broader topics.

I don't think it is racist to be anti-Isreal, Isreal is a Nation. The barrier to entry is language as well as religion. Most Isreali's are Jews but not all Jews are Isreali's so i keep this in mind.

Another point worth mentioning is that the prospective Isreali's were offered part of Africa as oppossed to Isreal but turned it down, which could have saved alot of strife.
 
> The book is more theory than anything, and includes broader topics.

> I don't think it is racist to be anti-Isreal, Isreal is a Nation. The
> barrier to entry is language as well as religion. Most Isreali's are Jews
> but not all Jews are Isreali's so i keep this in mind.

> Another point worth mentioning is that the prospective Isreali's were
> offered part of Africa as oppossed to Isreal but turned it down, which
> could have saved alot of strife.

Yes, I know why they "chose" where they did "Please".

Think about it?

Oil revenues are pretty scarce in the African Continent, why would America want a friendly neighbour there?

Anyway, before I have the label "racist" tagged on me for the umpteenth time I'll leave the buidling. However, just think on why some are termed racist for declaring the "truth" of the matter.

Goodnight and good reading.
 

Similar threads

S
2
Replies
23
Views
2K
L
S
Replies
1
Views
584
International Money Pirate
I
S
Replies
0
Views
641
seriously flawed - not right in the head
S
Back
Top Bottom