Re: You tosser
> That really is the most pathetic argument for whaling I think I've ever
> heard. Your argument is as follows;
> We stop the whales from eating the little fish so we can kill the little
> fish ourselves and feed them to the poor?
> Whaling is natural is it? Because humans do it? Fine. Then rape, incest
> and genocide are all natural as well. I eagerly await your stridently
> intellectual defences of those pursuits also.
Not buying it, Crushing. Via your logic, we should kill no animals at all, because one could take the slaughter of chickens or cows for human food and "extend" it to rape, incest, and genocide too. Which is ludicrous. For that matter, hey, we can't chop down any trees either because they're living beings too -- so, that means no expressways to drive on and essentially no modern society.
On the other hand, if you rationally agree that it makes sense for humans to cut down some trees in order to have a society, to kill some chickens to feed the citizens, to kill some cows to provide beef for its citizens, etc.... then why the magically drawn line on NOT killing whales?
I'm not slamming you, I'm just suggesting that your indignation against whale killing sounds suspiciously arbitrary and subjective.
J.T.