KATY IS A CUNT, KATY IS A CUNT, KATY IS A CUNT, KATY IS A CUNT, KATY IS A CUNT, KATY IS A CUNT
Katy you are a CUNT
MY ORIGINAL POST:
Your nation invaded Iraq too you daft wanker. Your notions regarding the war are incomplete. You are wrong about your nation's role in this conflict. Mr. Blair is a warmonger. He came to the United States repeatedly, met with President Bush repeatedly, and spoke before the U.S. Congress repeatedly, urging us to invade Iraq. Tony Blair, along with lies from British intelligence (an oxymoron) stated that Iraq was attempting to obtain, or rather had obtained, nuclear materials, in preparation to make a nuclear bomb. This was one of the main reasons the U.S. decided (along with Britain) to invade Iraq. Tony Blair is the biggest sellout of all time. To stand with President Clinton and champion the causes of the disenfranchised on one hand, and then to stand beside that Texan fool on the other, and send those same poor off to war, is the very epitome of hypocrisy. Mr. Blair & Mr. Bush, should both be tried for war crimes, and publicly hung for the mass murder of thousands of Iraqis, many of whom were mere civilians. The U.N. weapons inspectors recently reentered Iraq and found no weapons of mass destruction. Accordingly, both the British public and the American people were lied to, and the reasons given for attacking Iraq were fabricated. As a consequence, Mr. Blair & Mr. Bush should now be held accountable for their crimes.
Look you fucking bitch, I'm going to sit here and write a long arsed treatise on my statement, which I full stand by. I don't appreciate you calling me a slew of words, based on a mere misinterpretation of one of my posts. From that misinterpretation, you think that you can judge me, know my person, and draw conclusions about my beliefs. Look you fucking twat, I explained to you over and over and over again what I meant. I posted as "who else but me" & "your worst nightmare" & "the world won't listen," and "whoever I feel like being at this point in time" because I fucking felt like it.
Dissecting you shitty, long-winded, self-righteous, overly moral, argument piece by God damn fucking piece let me say this.
Seeing that I thanked you for not agreeing with “your worst nightmare’s” initial description of me as “an idiot”, I’m a little disappointed that you’ve abandoned civility for this second post and write that you are "reconsidering your former decision."
I'M FAIRLY SURE THAT CHILL DID THIS BECAUSE YOU WERE BEING OBTUSE IN REFUSING TO SEE THAT SEVERAL PERSONS, INCLUDING MYSELF ON MULTIPLE OCCASIONS, CHILL IN MULTIPLE EFFORTS, AND ONE OTHER PERSON WHO SAID WORDS TO THE AFFECT OF YOU ACTING LIKE YOU HAVE A "10 FOOT POLL STUCK UP YOUR ARSE," TRIED TO REASON WITH YOU AND SHOW YOU WHAT THE INTENTIONS BEHIND THAT POST WERE, BUT YOU REFUSED TO SEE THEM. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOU KATY, MYSELF, CHILL, AND THAT OTHER USER, IS THAT WE ARE REASONABLE IN OUR INTERPRETATION OF THE MEANING OF WORDS, MEANING WHICH IS DERIVED FROM CONTEXT. BY CONTRAST, YOU HAVE TAKEN A WORD, "MERE," AND DRIVEN OVER A CLIFF, FAR OUT OF ITS CONTEXT AND TWISTED THE ENTIRE MEANING OF MY POST. ALL REASONABLE PEOPLE AGREE THAT IT WAS A POST AGAINST WAR IN IRAQ, AGAINST THE U.S. & U.K. LED CAMPAIGN, AND FOR THE IRAQI PEOPLE.
"I have to say that, whilst not exactly calling me an idiot, this phrase does suggest that you are prepared to abandon reasoned argument for childish abuse, which I find a little disappointing."
CHILL DID NOT ABUSE YOU IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. I DID YOU FUCKING CUNT, AND I WILL CONTINUE TO ABUSE YOU, IF YOU CONTINUE TO JUDGE ME. GET OFF MY BACK.
"Your interpretation of “who else but me’s” original post is different from mine. Neither of us is in a position to say for sure exactly what he or she had in his/her heart when that post was written, but I have seen language like that used by evil people to justify terrible crimes. Human beings are described as “only” this or “merely” that, living breathing people are called cowlike morons."
YOU ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO SAY FOR SURE WHAT I MEANT, KATY, BUT I AM. I AM. I AM. I AM. I AM. I AM. I AM. HAVE I MADE MYSELF CLEAR? I AM. I MEANT THAT MANY OF THE PEOPLE KILLED IN IRAQ WERE CIVILIANS, INNOCENT CIVILIANS, THAT WERE NOT ENGAGING IN ANY KIND OF COMBAT OR TERRORISM. WHILE YOU SAY ON ONE HAND YOU ARE IN NO POSITION TO JUDGE ME, YOU TURN AROUND AND CALL ME A "COWLIKE MORON." I TAKE UMBRAGE AT THESE COMMENTS AND FIND YOUR ENTIRE STATEMENT CONTRADICTORY, AND THEREFORE LACKING IN MERIT, AS IT IS INCONSISTENT, HYPOCRITICAL, AND WAS EITHER WRITTEN IN BAD FAITH, OR BY AN IDIOT WHICH YOU HAVE PROVED TO BE TIME AND TIME AGAIN.
"You say that “for all intents and purposes we’re saying the exact same thing that we are” . I’m not sure who you mean by “we”? Are you aligning yourself with “who else but me” – if so I urge you to reconsider. Words may not appear to be that important to you at this stage of your emotional development, but how ideas are presented in written form is crucial to how society develops – all societies not just the comfortable western one we live in. As Morrissey sang (on “You Handsome Devil” from “Hatful of Hollow”) There’s more to life than books you know, but not much more."
PLEASE DON'T QUESTION ANYONE'S EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT IF YOU ARE NOT VERY ACQUAINTED WITH THEM. YOU DON'T KNOW CHILL AND YOU DO NOT KNOW ME. WE BOTH MAJORED IN ENGLISH. CHILL HAS SOME STUDYING COUREWORK LEFT, BUT NOT MUCH. WE BOTH, CHILL AND I, UNDERSTAND THAT LANGUAGE IS A DYNAMIC THING, ALWAYS CHANGING, AND IN A STATE OF FLUX. I HAVE STUDIED CRITICAL THEORY FROM PLATO THROUGH TO DERRIDA. I WAS TAUGHT BY THE MOST IMPORTANT LINGUIST LIVING, AS PROFESSOR DERRIDA IS A TENURED FACULTY MEMBER AT MY ALMA MATTER, ONE OF THE UNIVERSITIES IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEM. I'M SURE CHILL HAS STUDIED THEM, OR IS FAMILAR WITH THEM. WORDS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. MY LIFE REVOLVES AROUND THE STUDY OF WORDS, SPECIFCALLY LEXICOGRAPHY & ETYMOLOGY. IF YOU COULD BE ARSED INTO READING "CAUGHT IN THE WEB OF WORDS, JAMES MURRAY AND THE CREATION OF THE OXFORD ENGLISH DICTIONARY" BY K.M ELISABETH MURRAY, I THINK IT WOULD BE WORTH YOUR TIME, WITH THE CAVEAT BEING THAT IF YOU ARE TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THE TEXT, WHICH YOU HAVE DEMONSTRATED THAT YOU ARE, THAN DON'T BOTHER TRYING. THE REST OF YOUR WORDS IN QUOTES OTHER CULTURES BEING DIFFERENT FROM OURS, WOULD BE KNOWN TO ALL PERSONS WHO POSSESS SOME COMMON SENSE, READ, HAVE BEEN EDUCATED, AND/OR HAVE TRAVELED. YOU ARE NOT TELLING US ANYTHING WE DO NOT KNOW.
"Some of us are prepared to challenge this filth when it appears in a public forum and I will continue to do so. All that is needed for evil to triumph is for good men/women to do nothing."
AGAIN YOU HAVE SAID THAT YOU ARE NOT IN A POSITION TO SAY WHAT I HAD IN MY MIND OR HEART, AND YET YOU CALL MY WORDS "FILTH." I FIND THIS TO OFFENSIVE. MY WORDS WERE NOT FILTH, FOR THE REASONS I HAVE STATED.
"I certainly do not consider myself more “enlightened than the rest of us” – I consider my self more enlightened than “who else but me” and I would guess I have seen more of the world than you and appreciate the importance of not only showing respect to others of all backgrounds but also of clearly showing others of all backgrounds that you are prepared to show them respect. This inevitably involves careful use of language – there is nothing “politically correct” in that, in fact it’s simply about old fashioned respect for your fellow human beings."
I HAVE BEEN TO EVERY COUNTRY IN EUROPE, ALL OVER ASIA, THE MIDDLE EAST, THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINTENT, AFRICA, MEXICO. I HAVE SEEN MUCH OF THIS WORLD KATY. UNLIKE YOU, I WAS BORN IN A NATION FAR FAR AWAY FROM THE UNITED STATES. I HAVE MY ROOTS IN AT LEAST 5 DIFFERENT CULTURES. I SPEAK 5 DISTINCT LANGUAGES. I DON'T CONSIDER YOU MORE ENLIGHTENED THAT ME, AND I SERIOUS DOUBT THAT YOU POSSESS A DOCTORATE. I DO. YOU SAY THAT YOU DON'T CONSIDER YOURSELF MORE ENLIGHTENED THAN THE REST OF US, YET AGAIN YOU ARE JUDGING ME. I AM OFFENDED BY THESE REMARKS.
"I was initially confused about your claim that I was “making much too big a deal over the use of one small word”. You are clearly not an unintelligent person, and it’s difficult to believe that you really think that my argument can be reduced down to such a statement."
I THINK CHILL'S INTERPRETATION WAS ON POINT, AND CORRECT, AS YOU MADE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING, BY CHAMPIONING YOUR MEANING, AND NOT THE DICTIONARY'S DEFINITION. YOU DISMISSED THE WELL SETTLED CONNOTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF REASONABLE PEOPLE. YOUR ARGUMENT CAN BE REDUCED TO THE FOLLOWING: YOU ARE AN IDIOT, AND I REMAIN DEFIANT. FUCK YOU.
"At first I presumed that you had possibly misread my posts but, upon consideration, I’ve thought of a more likely explanation. I know for a fact that there is at least one contributor to this board that likes to intentionally “misunderstand” the serious points made by other posters in order to see if they can provoke an outraged reaction, which presumably causes amusement in the “misunderstanding” poster. A childish and rather pitiable recreation I’d have thought, but relatively harmless."
THERE ARE MANY THAT DO THIS KATY, MANY. MR. IMPROPER AND LIL ROB, COME TO MIND, THOUGH SOME PEOPLE LIKE THEM VERY MUCH AND FIND THEM FUNNY. EACH PERSON RESERVES THE RIGHT TO JUDGE FOR HIMSELF OR HERSELF, WHAT THEY FIND ENTERTAINING AND WORTHY AND WHAT THEY DO NOT.
WHAT THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO, IS TO TAKE SOMEONE'S WORDS, AND MANGLE THEM AS YOU HAVE, REVERSING THE GOOD INTENTIONS BEHIND THOSE WORDS, AND USING THEM IN AN OFFENSIVE WAY AGAINST MY PERSON. I DO AS I PLEASE, KATY. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, DON'T COME HERE.
"I’m sure you don’t do this regularly but I don’t think I’d be far wrong if I thought that you had decided to play this little game with me on this occasion?"
I CAN TELL YOU THAT CHILL IS NOT PLAYING ANY GAMES. UNDER MY REGULAR NAME KATY, WHICH YOU WILL NEVER BE PRIVY TO, I KNOW CHILL QUITE WELL AS I HAVE BEEN COMING HERE FOR A VERY LONG TIME. CHILL DOES NOT PLAY THESE KINDS OF GAMES. CHILL IS SMART, AND WISE BEYOND HER YEARS. I CARE FOR CHILL VERY MUCH AS FRIEND ON THIS MESSAGE BOARD. AND, I HOPE ONE DAY CHILL AND I COULD SIT DOWN FOR A COFFEE AS WE GET ALONG WELL IN THIS FORUM, AND HAVE MUCH IN COMMON.
"Don’t worry, I consider that there is no place for pomposity on a message board. I’m more than capable of laughing at myself , and don’t bear grudges. I have to say though, that I am a rather busy, in demand person, both socially and workwise, and won’t be able to find the time to join in the fun. For this reason, I think, having had my say, I’ll make this my last post in this sequence."
I AM HAPPY THAT YOU ARE AN IN DEMAND PERSON. I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT THE OLDEST TRADE IN THE BOOK, PROSTITUION IS ALIVE AND WELL. I THINK YOU SHOULD MAKE THIS YOUR LAST POST PERIOD, KATY. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME HERE.
"One last, I think decisive, thought; If “who else but me” had really had the innocuous intentions that you claim, does it not strike you as a little strange that he/she has not returned to the fray to argue the case, rather than let you and “your worst nightmare” do so on his/her behalf? I realise that not everyone accesses the board that frequently, but I hardly think that someone propounding such quasi-fascistic, military–worshipping views, would not visit again to see whether it had just been ignored or whether decent people had reacted like decent people should."
I DID RETURN TO THE FRAY AS "YOUR WORST NIGHTMARE," "THE WORLD WON'T LISTEN" & "WHOEVER I FEEL LIKE BEING AT THIS POINT IN TIME." IN ADDITION, I AM NOT A "QUASI-FASCISTIC, MILITARY WORSHIPPER." I AM AGAINST THIS WAR ON IRAQ AND I MADE THAT CLEAR. I AM OFFENDED AT YOUR COMMENTS.
"I for one am proud to make such a stand, and of the apparent result my comment has had – the apparent (voluntary) banishment from the board of an amoral contributor. The next time such a person decides to soil this board with such views, I’d like to think you’d be standing with me rather than excusing such behaviour."
I AM NOT AN AMORAL CONTRIBUTOR, YOU JUDGEMENTAL FUCKKING PIG. YOU BANISED NOBODY. I HAVE MANY FRIENDS HERE KATY, SOME EVEN CALL ME A "LEGEND." YOU WILL NEVER GET RID OF ME KATY. I'VE BEEN HERE FOR YEARS, CUNT. BY CONTRAST, I WILL NEVER ALLOW YOU TO POST AGAIN IN PEACE UNTIL YOU APOLOGIZE. YOU CAN BE EXPECTED TO BE CALLED EVERY NAME UNDER THE SUN FROM THIS DAY FORWARD, IN YOUR EVERY POST. I SUGGEST YOU TONE DOWN YOUR RHETORIC, AND GET A NICKNAME. YOU MIGHT SLEEP, BUT YOU WILL NEVER DREAM. AGAIN, FUCK YOU, YOU FUCKING SELF-RIGHTEOUS, OVERLY MORAL, HOLIER THAN THOUGH, STUPID, PREACHING, IDIOT, MISINTERPRETER OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, CUNT.
YOU OWE ME AN APOLOGY, BIG TIME, FOR JUDGING ME TO BE SOMEONE THAT IS ENTIRELY UNLIKE THE PERSON THAT I AM. YOU ATTACKED ME. WHEN WE TRIED TO ENLIGHTEN YOU, YOU ATTACKED ME AGAIN.
YOU CAN EITHER APOLOGIZE OR FACE MY WRATH. YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT I AM CAPABLE OF DOING. TAKE YOUR PICK. I SUGGEST YOU APOLOGIZE.