Please take a moment to explain how my opinion is a demonstration of your FBE without typing an F, a B and an E. Are you saying I concluded you defend subverse sexual habits because I have an epistemology of believing you masturbated to a stupid mysogynistic novel? Are all opinions from now on "faith based?"
You didn't state an opinion. You made a claim. A claim of truth with no evidence to back it up. Therefore your 'knowledge' was derived from a faith based epistemology. Not a reason based one:
I like to pretend I'm into Sub/Dom because I masturbated to Fifty Shades of Grey twice so it's my duty to defend subversive sex genres I have zero clue about.
You claimed, as fact, that:
I. I like to
pretend I am Dom/sub.
2. I like to pretend I am Dom/sub because I
masturbated to Fifty Shades of Grey.
3. Because I masturbated to Fifty Shades of Grey and pretend I am dom/sub, I defend subversive subcultures.
1. Is a false claim without evidence to back it up.
2.Two is a false claim without evidence to back it up.
Therefore your conclusion (#3) is one which is derived without evidence and was formulated based on faith. Therefore your epistemology is faith-based. FBE.
If you want to offer opinions don't state them as facts. Perhaps ask, "Could it be that you support diverse subcultures because you learned about them after you read Fifty Shades of Grey?"
To which I'd reply, "I have had this opinion long before the book came out. I took a class in college called Human Sexual Behavior where I learned about these paraphilias (and subcultures). I learned they were variations of sexual expression but not disorders. I learned to be tolerant.
So you see, you can offer an opinion which may stimulate a discussion where two people can interact like normal people. Or you can make blanket statements attacking someone's motives and character with accusations you derived at from a FBE.
It is your choice.