It's entirely possible to hold a multi-faceted, nuanced view of this 'Olympic event', recognising both the 'mass consciousness effect' of the TeamGB medalsfest whilst still keeping the superstructure of corporate profiteering, deficit cuts and historical debauchery of 'the Olympic ideal' in clear focus. Maintaining balance with this complexity seems to be impossible for many, including Morrissey. I can't see why the Olympics as 'urban renewal' trigger is contentious. I've lived in East London. I hope there will be legacy dividends. Morrissey doesn't live in Plaistow.
Someone here will doubtless explain Will Self's bizarre assertion that a shopping centre in Stratford has civilisational defining qualities whilst an identical one in Shepherd's Bush has no such ominous connotations. Lol! Just because someone has celebrity status as a 'thinker' and sprays words like cat-piss doesn't mean they should be accepted as an infallible authority.
The 7/7 tragedy that followed the announcement of London's successful bid is irrelevant to the OTT security operation? Is it really sensible to dismiss fears of a terrorist reprise as just 'paranoiac'?
The days are long gone when 'cultural authorities and celebrities' could demand deference for their 'expert' opinions. Pop stars, journalists, authors. It's an appeal to some imagined 'intellectual hierarchy' whereby the 'professional gatekeepers' manage public opinion through the media. That world has completely collapsed, whether it's the meta-narrative of an established corporate/political elite or the 'rebellious'memes of any 'counterculture'.
Competition in sport isn't going away. International competition in trade, technology and culture isn't going away. It's sometimes very instructive to look at how this 'mass consciousness event' is being interpreted elsewhere:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2012...-weiwei-review
Morrissey? Self? Aiweiwei? Who has the radical remix interpretative worldview amongst the three? How long will it take me to decide? [rollseyes]
regards