This thread’s premise is simply a defamatory lie. No one has accused Quiffaa of “stealing” from anyone, or of committing any "theft." (Note by the way that my use of quotation marks, unlike Theo's, always indicates an actual
quote.) They accused her of taking too long to repay a small debt. (Was a time frame for repayment agreed upon? No idea.) She’s now admitted this and paid them. What happened in the meantime—evidently a standard cold war between debtor and debtee—is piddly gossip for the terminally bored. What she did wrong, if one takes the harshest view possible, wouldn’t have earned her a segment on
Judge Judy.
Quiffaa, by the way, is a member of this site. She is presumably protected by the TOS, which should prevent the use of personal information to harass someone. This incident, involving no online transaction (to my knowledge), is certainly "personal." I say that not to criticize the use of the internet to confront her with the debt on
her site, but to criticize using this information to harass her (this harassment being cheered on a moderator, unsurprisingly) on
this site.
But we know how that works by now, don’t we? The administrator and the moderators have made their attitude toward their critics very clear, many times. All trolls have a green light where Quiffaa’s concerned. Theo knows this, and he’s wanking himself into a stupor over it.
Meanwhile, somewhere back there in his hundreds (or thousands?) of words of malicious, sniggering spin about this, Theo lectures us about what’s “healthy.” Did anyone’s irony meter explode?
That slimeball would be me, quoting Kewpie! Kewpie has more than once
posted that the "site administrator will not consider things which do not give him much benefit."
To interpret “benefit” as a reference to ad revenue is reasonable. (All utterances by Kewpie or Tseng require some interpretation, unfortunately. You have her poor English on the one hand, and his chronic worminess on the other.) We cannot however ever know if this is a profitable site—or even if it is intended as one—because David Tseng had always waffled in his answers to the question. This site was initially run thanks in part to “donations” that Tseng spent many years soliciting. If the site then became, or ever does become, a for-profit venture—which Tseng refuses to disclose, either as having happened or as being his future or present intention--then those donations were investments, and should be treated as such.
Converting a “donation” into an investment, but providing no return; and refusing all demands for transparency on the matter? There’s “stealing” for you, Theo. Make a thread about that, if you ever get tired of kissing admin/mod ass in exchange for trolling privileges.
Oh, but Peter, I thought you wanted to “hear no”/”see no”! This is a faster turnaround than usual for you. Anyway, how many posts and threads on this site have you deleted? (But those were by
bad people, right--not just ones who called you on your sneaking, lying, asshole behavior?) And why did all references to your Jed Skullcap fiasco disappear from Theo’s past posts, after you suspended his account for what you called racist content (he had simply quoted Robby, who wasn’t himself disciplined)? It was a while ago, and you and David have scrubbed the site clean of many, many posts about this over time, but you remember what I’m talking about--don’t you, old fella? Try! I recall one post that was edited well after Theo could have edited it himself. A moderator, or the administrator, had to have assisted.
You twisted his arm just a little bit, didn’t you? Had to keep your place in Moz fandom, as an
insider, secure. I also recall that your replies to Theo’s threads were invariably contemptuous before that episode, but since then, you applaud his every fart. Mutual blackmail: awkward, but for mentally disabled internet addicts, I guess it’s the bond that brings you together!
Well?
Suspended. See above for a reminder.
Funny that you deleted all those shrieking references to Uncleskinny and “Jed Skullcap” from something like a half dozen of your posts as soon as your suspension was up, then—and you also immediately earned from Uncleskullcap a hilariously official and apropos-of-nothing declaration of your non-trollness, which you proudly reproduced and bragged about elsewhere. A little something went on there, no? Come on! Be proud of your pathetic scheming!
I think you’re after !Viva Hate!’s vacated roll as David Tseng’s star attack dog. It’s great that you love this site so much, Theo! Thing is, you’ve said so many times in the past that it sucks! I could find more examples, but the search engine isn’t worth a damn. (Strangely, Theo’s and CrystalGeezer’s posts can’t specifically be searched.)
You go, tiger!
By the way, as for the law-breaking bastards on that frinkalicious other site...
... I’m aware of some downright sinister behavior here, too!
Stalking, for example!
And best of all—
grand theft auto! A bona fide felony!
That’s from the site’s idiot savant mascot, though, so it occassioned nothing but a lot of oooohs and awwwws. When she’s found dead, you guys can pretend you weren’t enabling the downward spiral. Good luck.
Anyway. You’re a bunch of lying, stalking, idiotic assholes. Middle-aged, closeted, alcoholic virgins. Take up bingo. This thread to be deleted in five, four, three, two…
