Morrissey interview in Il Manifesto (Italian)

It looks like a character from another time, it would be seen right next to the late nineteenth century poets and writers such as Charles Dickens or, especially, Oscar Wilde. But more than thirty years is one of the most influential rockers of our time. His birth certificate says Steven Patrick Morrissey, born in Manchester, England, May 22, 1959, but the public knows him simply as Morrissey and the fans and the innermost call him Moz (another reference to Dickens, whose nickname was Boz). In the eighties, he was known for being the voice of the Smiths, band mainstay of the British new wave scene, a beautiful story, however brief, which lasted for the space of a few years and four albums between 1984 and 1987, and the dissolution of the contemporary beginning of the solo career of the singer of Irish descent, the shy boy and weirdo who liked to appear on stage with gladioli in jeans. But Morrissey was and is also a character and an inconvenient artist, who has never sent to speak with his lyrics thick with melancholy, romance, even tragic, but also very ironic and pungent, with texts that they resented the policies of Western countries or touching themes dear to him as vegetarianism and veganism, or sexuality. Arguments in which he remained faithful even after leaving the group that has led to international fame and accolades from audiences and critics alike, and has continued to develop during these years in his solo work, since the last arrived, world peace Is None of Your Business (the peace of the world is not none of your business) came out for the Harvest, which takes aim at heavily once again, society and politics. So how has remained faithful even to his musical idea, continuing in a speech that unites, although not always with outstanding results, pop to rock, contaminating everything - and this is the last new work - with hints of Latin America, thanks the presence of Gustavo Manzur, who assists in the writing of three songs.

But the genesis of this new album, the tenth, was not at all simple, beginning with the difficulty that Morrissey has encountered in finding a record label that would accept its instances and uphold his artistic desires, and a bit 'as it was happened in the nineties, when he was forced to stay out of the loop for seven years, also had to wait a long time to be able to come back to sing at all, in his own way. And not only through the support phonograph, but also with a tour, party recently and over the next few days will touch some Italian cities, from Rome, where he will perform for two nights, Monday 13 (date already sold out) and Tuesday 14 Atlantic Live, followed by Milan where he is expected Thursday 16th at the Teatro Linear4Ciak, and then Bologna (17 to Paladozza), Pescara (19 at Pala John Paul II), and still Obihall of Florence (21) for close the minitournée Italic 22 at the Gran Teatro Geox in Padua.

On the eve of these appearances we heard on our stages. And just thinking about the long waiting period between his previous work, Years of Refusal, and World Peace is None of Your Business - five years have seen him often complain about the difficulty to bind to a label and find a new record deal - we tried to ask him what idea he had made ​​about the role of the labels today. But what happened just a few days ago - an interview in which you said you had cancer in an advanced state - compels us to overturn the terms and questions, so starting from that which in reality was our last question, as Morrissey Morrisey imagine over the coming years: "I do not know! I've never been able to look too far ahead in time. I always thought that the end is near, so do not do programs, I can not even tell you if I'll be here next March ... ". An answer that in light of this horrible news to be read in a completely different way rather than as a simple, ironic joke to Morrissey. But to return to the beginning, from the Morrissey-thinking on the current state of the record labels, "I think if the music in pop right now is in a big mess, it is precisely because of the majors. Put under contract only artists banal, simple-minded that they have nothing to say. And so we find ourselves in ranking female only "female" and "soft" and boys who seem to all street artists. It is unfortunate for those who really love the music. We have only one chance: to kill us (laughs). For me I think the music I do, we do me and my band, has a socio-political basis that the majors do not like, and then ... ".

Death then, a topic often treated by the musician from Manchester, as well as in his lyrics are often echoed criticism, even heavy, to the social and political conditions in his country and, more generally, in the western world. And just days before the referendum which ratified the permanence of Scotland within the UK, we could not pass up the opportunity for us to know its position in this regard: "I ​​would be very happy if Scotland had voted for its independence, I've always loved the people who rebelled and who were able to challenge the dictatorships. Like many others I think that England is experiencing a very difficult time. Politically we are ridiculous, and the dictatorship of the royal family is annoying. All day, every day, we have to undergo news about Kate Middleton on Prince Harry, Prince William on, and it's crazy, I would say tragic, because the majority of the British people do not want the monarchy. The monarchy was autoeletta, and so the British have no choice, and if you do not have a choice means that you are not a democratic country, that England is not. With regard to the western world however, it seems to me that people, everywhere, is trying to change things, and I like that. We are really tired of fascism, dictators, despots, Presidents who love war, corruption and poverty. The Queen of England owns thirteen islands! And it certainly did not need it! If the sell could easily fight poverty. But she is greedy, and still receives every year 200 million pounds from British workers. Everything is grotesque, besides being simply disgraceful. "

We try to bring the discussion about music, but about the past is a wall, and bulldozing gallantly on a couple of questions about the Smiths and Johnny Marr - it is clear that the wound has not yet healed completely - and then back to the present, and latin influences present in the new album and collaboration with Gustavo Manzur: "Gustavo has had and has a strong influence on me, and we wrote a lot of songs together, even for the next album (album that was supposed to publish in the same Harvest but that is perhaps having already broken the existing contract for differences on the promotion of World Peace ..., ed.) But in general I am very happy with the relationship with the rest of the band, which is the same that has supported me for the previous work. More than a band, rather than musicians who play with me, they are dear friends. "

Are part of the training, in addition to Manzur, even guitarists Boz Boorer and Jesse Tobias, bassist Solomon Walker and drummer Matthew Walker, but in his solo career, Morrissey has had close even people like Stephen Street or Alain Whyte, but what are those with which it has established the best value? "I do not know why people always appoint Stephen Street although we did together one drive and we've never played live, and we talk about 26 years ago! I must say that I really loved working with Alain Whyte, Boz but that kept us together, and it is sadly underrated. It annoys me when someone makes a comparison of the actual musicians with the Smiths. Jesse, Solomon and Matthew are definitely good, but do not receive the proper appreciation. Johnny Marr, for example, was a great guitarist, but he had a big flaw, the stage was too shy and nervous. "

There is much talk about a supposed collection compiled by Morrissey on the Ramones, and the surprising thing is not just because our memories take us back to an article of almost forty years ago in the New Musical Express, a review, apparently for nothing benevolent, a Sex Pistols concert in the Manchester, and we remembered it somewhat critical of the punk in general ...

"No, you're wrong! I loved very much punk in its early years. I did not like the Sex Pistols' album, the cover and the title were absolutely terrible! I saw their first three concerts in Manchester, and I liked a lot. I loved it though especially the Generation X and X-Ray Specks, and I think that the first four discs of the Ramones were incredible. But it is only now that these groups have become part of the general taste, as has happened to bands like Velvet Underground, New York Dolls or Jobriath. When they got their first jobs who liked certain artists was considered a mental illness, but fortunately today things have changed and teenagers listen to and love an artist like Nico. And I think we should be happy for that. "

Now is the time of the leave, remained that last curiosity which, today, and tomorrow, we would like to give a very different meaning.
 
Johnny too shy and nervous on stage? That's a good bit of revisionism. He might not have been the whirling dervish Morrissey was on stage, but he certainly had a lively presence (and still does).
 
Thanks for the translation!

Sure, but it's not much of one. There are at least three key sections where he could have actually said any one of six different things but we'll never know because the context is lost and the sentence structure is garbled.
 
Sure, but it's not much of one. There are at least three key sections where he could have actually said any one of six different things but we'll never know because the context is lost and the sentence structure is garbled.

Ingrate
 
"said you had cancer in an advanced state"

Nowhere did he say anything about having cancer, let alone in an advanced stage.
 
Johnny too shy and nervous on stage? That's a good bit of revisionism. He might not have been the whirling dervish Morrissey was on stage, but he certainly had a lively presence (and still does).

Certainly, if you back at all those old Smiths performances on Youtube (or wherever), Johnny is hardly 'shy'. Having said that, I wonder if this may be a slight case of translation issues. Even Johnny has been talking a lot recently in interviews about how he has only recently fallen in love with touring, and used to be very much more in love with spending all his time in the studio working on songs. I can imagine it being the case back in the Smiths days, that Moz was the driving force in getting the band out on the road so much, while Johnny maybe wasn't always so keen, and would rather be working on a new 7".

But then Moz is always on the defensive, against people who he obviously misses in an artistic sense: Marr, Whyte and Street. Because, naturally, he has to agressively insist that what he has now is the best he's ever had. But then the audience look at Jesse Tobias, and well....talent will shine. But so will mediocrity.

And really, even discounting his musical ability, it's not as thought Mr Tobias is a whirling dervish on stage. He, along with the rest of the band, stays firmly at the back of the stage in 'backing band' status, only occasionally venturing forward at tiresomely pre-orchestrated moments when he has a guitar solo, only scurry back into the safety of the back of stage as soon as his 20 seconds are up.
 
And cue more cancer hysteria.

I think Moz has underestimated the impact these vague and poorly translated statements have on his fans. Having gone this far in revealing things a simple..."it's an ongoing fight" or "I've had treatment and for the moment I'm ok" would suffice. I thought his comment that he made about feeling good at the moment was reassuring, but the subsequent comments confused matters. I don't want to think about when the day comes...it comes to us all. But Morrissey does have many, many devoted and sensitive fans who will feel saddened and deeply depressed by this news. He does have a responsibility to clear this up just a little.
 
I think Moz has underestimated the impact these vague and poorly translated statements have on his fans. Having gone this far in revealing things a simple..."it's an ongoing fight" or "I've had treatment and for the moment I'm ok" would suffice. I thought his comment that he made about feeling good at the moment was reassuring, but the subsequent comments confused matters. I don't want to think about when the day comes...it comes to us all. But Morrissey does have many, many devoted and sensitive fans who will feel saddened and deeply depressed by this news. He does have a responsibility to clear this up just a little.

Totally agree with this post. I'm so confused: is he ill or is he not? It seems to me Moz is intentionally casting a veil of dubt on this. Am I the only one who actually thinks this?
 
Totally agree with this post. I'm so confused: is he ill or is he not? It seems to me Moz is intentionally casting a veil of dubt on this. Am I the only one who actually thinks this?

No - I agree. The longer he leaves this vague 'cancerous scrapings' comment out there, without clearing it up. Let's be honest - this is Morrissey, and he ADORES and thrives on drama and hyperbole -so I am hoping this is one of those instances where he is exaggerating the seriousness of his condition. Also, I hate to say it - but I am sure he is aware that 'star dying of caner' will boost publicity and ticket sales as well.
 
"All day, every day, we have to undergo news about Kate Middleton on Prince Harry, Prince William on, and it's crazy, I would say tragic, because the majority of the British people do not want the monarchy." - Morrissey

"Three quarters of people believe that the newborn Prince George will one day accede to the throne to which he is third in line, the ComRes survey for The Sunday Telegraph found.

Just 9 per cent of those questioned think that he will not become king because Britain will have become a republic — whereas a poll in 2011 found that a quarter of people expected a republic to emerge within 50 years.

Even among 18 to 24-year-olds, the age group most likely to hold republican views, today’s poll shows a solid 69 per cent believe that Prince George will one day become king.
The poll suggests that the majority of the country sees no benefit in republicanism, with some two thirds of those polled (66 per cent) thinking that Britain is better off as a monarchy.

Only 17 per cent wanted a republic instead."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ish-monarchy-at-all-time-high-poll-shows.html

So, the question is simple: Is Morrissey a liar or just an embarrassing out of touch old fool? Anyone who has seen his foreign language interviews, particularly in South America, will know that the answer to that question is clearly "both". How exactly does it help his viewpoint on monarchy, on anything in fact, if he simply makes it up as he goes along aided and abetted by amateur scribblers who are no more real journalists than my cat?

Now he has given up the music business he seems to have appointed himself as a sort of anti-Ambassador for Britain, wandering the world spreading disinformation about a country he plainly loathes. These minor publications either do not have the courage to challenge him, or are as ignorant as he is. How hard would it have been for this "journalist", knowing Morrissey's modus operandi, to simply look up the numbers beforehand and challenge him? It took me ninety seconds. Are they really that afraid of him?

Morrissey reminds me a lot of Roy Keane and Alan Moore. All three have long since ceased to produce their best, and rather than go quietly are determined to blame their disminishing powers on all and sundry.
 
Totally agree with this post. I'm so confused: is he ill or is he not? It seems to me Moz is intentionally casting a veil of dubt on this. Am I the only one who actually thinks this?

Perhaps Morrissey sees a cancer scare as a method to drive ticket sales. He's obviously capable of such vile cynicism despite his ludicrous protestations of being a kind and sensitive man. At this point everything is grist to his mill. Terror victims, dead nurses, cancer. Meh. What's the difference? Whatever makes the tills ring. Trebles all round, Gustavo!
 
Not sure what bores me most, hearing about the Royal Family directly, hearing Morrissey talk about the amount of attention the Royal Family receive or hearing other people talk about Morrissey talking about the Royal Family.
 
Perhaps Morrissey sees a cancer scare as a method to drive ticket sales. He's obviously capable of such vile cynicism despite his ludicrous protestations of being a kind and sensitive man. At this point everything is grist to his mill. Terror victims, dead nurses, cancer. Meh. What's the difference? Whatever makes the tills ring. Trebles all round, Gustavo!

And this is not cynicism? f*** me, you are ludicrous. And scary.
 
And this is not cynicism? f*** me, you are ludicrous. And scary.

I love Morrissey as much as the next man, but even I can see how him using this to sell tickets is not beyond the bounds of reason. This is a guy who has been teasing his audience with the threat of being discovered dangling from a hangman's noose since the days of The Smiths...and he's still here.
 
Totally agree with this post. I'm so confused: is he ill or is he not? It seems to me Moz is intentionally casting a veil of dubt on this. Am I the only one who actually thinks this?

I feel the same way. When the cancer thing first caught wind I got about 20 people texting me/Facebooking me saying HOLY SHIT DID YOU HEAR MORRISSEY HAS CANCER. But it seems very vague to me, and yes, intentionally so on his part. It seems like a half-assed blurb designed to be blown out of proportion. And EVERYTHING is coming from this halfwit translation software, so who knows. Strange that this is revealed in the foreign press...

He's so adept at his TTY epistles regarding every mundanity under the sun...when I see one that definitively explains things, well, then I'll take it seriously. I hate to say this but in the meantime I agree with Barleycorn...it's probably meant to boost hype.
 
He is obviously still getting treated for cancer. Four times in the past 18 months? Every major news outlet has published it in the past week; the guardian, daily-mail, rolling stone.. They check sources better than we do.. Plus, truetopropaganda.net would have a ominous letter bashing people who spread lies on the main page if it weren't true!

Really? You do know those media outlets took the same translated quote and pain a story around it.

Grow some brain cells.
 

Trending Threads

Back
Top Bottom