TQID cited in Guardian article about getting trackorder right
posted by davidt on Friday July 25 2008, @04:00AM

Torr sends the link / excerpt:

Getting your order right - The Guardian music blog

July 24, 2008 1:30 PM

Great artists like David Bowie and The Smiths knew the importance of track sequencing - it can make or break an album ...

The opener isn't always a big hit single. The Smiths' classic The Queen Is Dead opens with the rampaging title track ... but imagine it kicking off with the playful Vicar In A Tutu? The whole album just wouldn't have had the same momentum.

 
Morrissey-solo Login
Nickname:

Password:

Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· Torr
· Getting your order right
· More News/Media stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt

* [ Add a comment to this item ]

TQID cited in Guardian article about getting trackorder right | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Agreed (Score:1)
It's an obvious practice that seems to have been lost in recent times, most likely being due to most bands forgetting an album IS an album - a collection piece and body of work, as opposed to a mish-mash of made-for singles only.

Oasis kicking off What's the Story Morning Glory with 'Hello', Strangeways kicking off the last album by the Smiths with the deliriously ambiguous 'A Rush And A Push...' and Vauxhall opening with the achingly beautiful 'Now My Heart Is Full' set the tone and pace far better than any written explanation would allow.
tomdolan04 -- Friday July 25 2008, @04:08AM (#308281)
(User #21355 Info)
[ Reply to this comment ]
    I disagree. (Score:1)
    I don't believe that the track order (by itself) would have a monumental effect on The Queen is Dead.

    Here's why: The Smiths had already gained a huge following well before The Queen is Dead. Track order would not have had any measurable or significant effect. Each song "belongs" on this album without regard to track order.

    I will also take this one step further. "Vicar in a Tutu" would have been a GREAT opener--

    It would not be as stirring, but it still would have been terrific--especially if it were to be followed by "Take Me Back to Dear Old Blighty."

    I do wish, however, that "There is a Light..." would have been the last track. But there is something haunting about "Some Girls...", and it is a terrific ending track, too.

    This debate has been discussed before. I don't think it makes a great deal of difference. If you have to twist my arm, "Louder than Bombs" has a perfect track listing.

    Peace.

    Ken
    sycophantic_slag -- Friday July 25 2008, @08:13AM (#308292)
    (User #3940 Info | http://www.geocities.com/Fadeaway314/SlimBuzz.html )
    "And I just can't explain/ So I won't even try to."
    [ Reply to this comment ]
    track order/sequencing does matter... (Score:1)
    but TQID is a bad example of a great job of it.

    the opener is perfect, but its unthinkable that they couldve opened that album with anything else given the songs they were choosing from- its obviously an opener.

    they didnt execute the rest of the sequencing to full effect- not by a long shot. "I Know It's Over" and "Never Had No One Ever" back to back at tracks 3 and 4 is way too heavy and "There Is A Light That Never Goes Out" should have been the closer, though ive warmed to "Some Girls Are Bigger Than Others" as a closer over the past while.

    TQID is actually a prime example of a great album with poor sequencing.
    chrisarclark <clarkinatorclark@hotmail.com> -- Saturday July 26 2008, @10:17AM (#308326)
    (User #9259 Info)
    "I'm just passing through here on my way to somewhere civilized and maybe I'll even arrive, maybe I'll even arrive..."
    [ Reply to this comment ]


    [ home | submit story/news item | archive/search | past polls | faq | preferences | terms of service | rss ]