Morrissey-solo | "Is Merck back with Morrissey?"

Main
Archive/Search
* Tour
Forums
Gallery
Calendar
Links
Shoplifters Union
Site Sponsors
About
FAQ

* * *

topics
journals
past polls
hall of fame
recent comments
submit story

create acct./
log in

"Is Merck back with Morrissey?" - CMU Newsletter

posted by davidt on Friday June 20 2008, @09:00AM

Brunette Coleman writes:

From the CMU Newsletter today (June 20 08):

"IS MERCK BACK WITH MORRISSEY?

Gossipers say that Morrissey has already asked his long time manager Merck Mercuriadis to start working for him again, just weeks after the two parted company ahead of Mozza's new management agreement with ie:music's US outpost."

Morrissey-solo Login

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links

· More News/Media stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt

* [ Add a comment to this item ]

"Is Merck back with Morrissey?" - CMU Newsletter | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

No (Score:0)

Because if you read the post above, Merck says that he has parted company with Morrissey. So this post is rather amusing

Anonymous -- Friday June 20 2008, @09:18AM (#305257)

[ Reply to this comment ]

Re:No by Brunette Coleman (Score:1) Friday June 20 2008, @09:58AM

Rather odd. (Score:1)

Let me get this straight...

On the same day the rumor pops up that Morrissey has re-hired Merck (after letting him go 2-3 weeks ago), Merck just happens to show up on a site dedicated to his former employer to defend him against rumors and reassure everyone he is not currently employed by Morrissey?

Right...fishy.

Either they are holding back the information of Merck's return to management of Morrissey or Merck has too much time on his hands.

Love you either way Merck...now how about that Hollywood Bowl DVD?

Viva Hate, OBGYN -- Friday June 20 2008, @10:07AM (#305272)
(User #20618 Info | http://www.myspace.com/thecolddick )
Learn to love me...

[ Reply to this comment ]