|
Editorial on Morrissey's Canada comments in National Post
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 97 comments
| Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
Anonymous
-- Thursday March 30 2006, @10:36AM
(#207578)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
(Score:2, Interesting)
|
Sullen
-- Thursday March 30 2006, @10:37AM
(#207579)
(User #11477 Info)
Resentments are like drinking poison and hoping that the other person dies.
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by ohglen
(Score:1)
Thursday March 30 2006, @11:25AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @12:35PM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @06:15PM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by glamorous shoplifter
(Score:1)
Friday March 31 2006, @06:22AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Montrealer
(Score:1)
Saturday April 01 2006, @02:00PM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by glamorous shoplifter
(Score:1)
Monday April 03 2006, @06:17AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Montrealer
(Score:1)
Monday April 03 2006, @10:33AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by glamorous shoplifter
(Score:1)
Monday April 03 2006, @10:45AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by glamorous shoplifter
(Score:1)
Monday April 03 2006, @10:48AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Montrealer
(Score:1)
Monday April 03 2006, @02:53PM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by glamorous shoplifter
(Score:1)
Tuesday April 04 2006, @05:17AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by Osakaglen
(Score:1)
Thursday March 30 2006, @11:26AM
- Re:Boycott Canada? Canada, boycott Moz!
by ouija bored
(Score:1)
Thursday March 30 2006, @06:29PM
|
|
Oh, Morrissey....
(Score:0)
|
|
Anonymous
-- Thursday March 30 2006, @11:34AM
(#207613)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
- Re:Canada?
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @12:36PM
- Re:Canada?
by Galacto
(Score:1)
Thursday March 30 2006, @12:48PM
- Re:Canada?
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @01:06PM
- Re:Canada?
by Galacto
(Score:1)
Thursday March 30 2006, @01:26PM
- Re:Canada?
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @01:30PM
- Re:Canada?
by Anonymous
(Score:0)
Thursday March 30 2006, @05:17PM
|
|
Morrissey Sacrifices Canada To Promote New Album
(Score:3, Insightful)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
I guess he does prefer Bush....
(Score:0)
|
|
Anonymous
-- Thursday March 30 2006, @03:51PM
(#207729)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
German gas chambers
(Score:0)
|
|
Anonymous
-- Thursday March 30 2006, @09:00PM
(#207817)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Who the hell is morrissey?
(Score:0)
|
|
Anonymous
-- Friday March 31 2006, @12:39AM
(#207838)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Missing The Point
(Score:1)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Viva Morrissey !
(Score:1)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Anonymous
-- Friday March 31 2006, @05:22AM
(#207906)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Anonymous
-- Friday March 31 2006, @06:10AM
(#207912)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Missing the point
(Score:1)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Mission Accomplished
(Score:1)
|
Anaesthesine
-- Friday March 31 2006, @07:22AM
(#207928)
(User #14203 Info)
We will burn that bridge when we come to it...
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Quote from Wikipedia.org re: Morrissey
(Score:0)
|
|
Anonymous
-- Friday March 31 2006, @08:02AM
(#207940)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Anonymous
-- Friday March 31 2006, @09:02AM
(#207956)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
|
Canadians have spoken
(Score:1)
|
|
|
[ Reply to this comment
]
|
|
This is exactly the type of discourse that contaminates every debate of this kind. Morrissey's, Anderson's and McCartney's arguments are dismissed as uninformed and childish, as opposed to arguments presented by experts. The problem lies in the assumption that this issue can be resolved by mechanical reasoning based on self-evident premises and that these premises are accepted by everyone. This is marketed as the “rational“ way of dealing with it, as opposed to the “emotional“ way.
But when you see seals being killed by humans, why is it so wrong to just be “against“? This IS a moral issue and I think the pro-hunters are stealing the debate by trying to label certain types arguments as “rational“ as opposed to those who are childish, zealous and emotional.