Moz mentioned in article on surrogate / copy cat bands - The Guardian
posted by davidt on Tuesday July 26 2005, @09:00AM

Belligerent Ghoul sends the link:

Look back in anger - The Guardian, July 23, 2005

Justin Quirk wishes bands took a broader view of the past

Excerpt:

The bands just copying the past are particularly pointless because they way that they do it is so one-dimensional. Nostalgia doesn't just mean aping the past, but refers to a yearning for your home - ie one that you actually remember, rather than some strange idea you have of a time before you were born. It also has nothing to do with a quasi-nationalistic, idealised history. The few songwriters who get it right have grasped that your memories of a time and place are as bound up with the bad as the good, and that looking back is not necessarily a happy experience. This ambiguity was captured perfectly on odd occasions by Ray Davies (on Dead End Street, for example), Willy Mason's Live It Up and by much of Morrissey's output until he declined into being a passable Morrissey tribute act. Since his decline, the spirit of old England has been most consistently evoked by Luke Haines.

related:

Cool for copy cats - The Guardian, July 22, 2005

Dave Simpson on why now is such a fertile time for the 'surrogate band'


 
Morrissey-solo Login
Nickname:

Password:

Public Terminal

[ Create a new account ]

Related Links
· Look back in anger
· Cool for copy cats
· More News/Media stories
· More Index stories
· Also by davidt

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Moz mentioned in article on surrogate / copy cat bands - The Guardian | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 5 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Oof (Score:1)
The Guardian must have been running short on stories this week, sinking to the depths of actually paying money to a passable music journalist.
Keely <readyletsroll @hotmail.com> -- Tuesday July 26 2005, @10:15AM (#172854)
(User #13344 Info)
    I hate this crap (Score:2, Insightful)
    It annoys me, because my dream job would be journalism, but I'd hope to write something infinitely more worthy than this age old tripe about recycling the past.
    Memo to the journo: everyone is nostalgic for a time they can hardly remember, precisely because their memory is distorted by some pleasant association with that point in their lives, or with that time in history.
    I mean, the guy even defeated his own argument by acknowledging that imitation can lead to continued success, should the musician(s) be willing to adapt. You don't say?!
    In all honesty, all the bands mentioned rip off someone or other, and seeing as indie music owes The Smiths a huge debt for their originality, Morrissey should be considered above all this comparison; Chris Martin doesn't even deserve column space with Moz (as lovely as 'The Scientist' sounded on the last effort, the lyrics on his current album are abysmal).
    So what if music goes in waves; it always has done. Get used to it, or move to Nashville.

    Mozzersgirl -- Tuesday July 26 2005, @04:55PM (#172890)
    (User #14229 Info)
    But we can't give you love and rhetoric without the blood. Blood is compulsory.
    • Re:I hate this crap by glamorous shoplifter (Score:1) Wednesday July 27 2005, @04:25AM
        Re:I hate this crap (Score:2, Insightful)
        It's basically because they have the idea that popstars should "reinvent" themselves like Bowie or Madonna do.

        This really means that popstars should chase the latest fad and have a wardrobe change and new haircut in order to keep selling loads of records.

        Anyone who is true to themselves is dismissed as "a parody of themselves".
        Anonymous -- Wednesday July 27 2005, @04:39AM (#172922)
        [ Parent ]


    [ home | submit story/news item | archive/search | past polls | faq | preferences | terms of service | rss ]