posted by davidt on Monday January 10 2011, @12:00PM
jeremy writes:
The sexual ambiguity of pop artist Diamond Rings is compared to Morrissey's in an AOL interview (12/29/10):

Diamond Rings Doesn't Need to Label Himself Gay or Straight - Spinner

Excerpt:

When he's onstage performing as Diamond Rings, the one-man synth-pop project he started two years ago, John O'Regan wears biker jackets, leggings, lipstick and basketball shoes. The Canadian singer draws on a rich tradition of androgynous musicians, and while his look recalls David Bowie, Boy George and maybe even Grace Jones, he often comes across in interviews more like Morrissey, skirting questions about sexuality.

If Morrissey's coyness on the subject reflects his private nature -- surprising, perhaps, given his songwriting -- and desire to preserve a degree of mystery, O'Regan can relate. At the same time, he says his refusal to self-identify as gay or straight is more the product of uncertainty and not feeling like he has to pick a side.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • If you have not noticed yet, it is called BIsexuality, nothing mysterious about it. Also there is no sexual "continuity" but only so many things that one can do with another person's body. If the genitals are involved, it is called sex. So if somebody says he had sex and that legs were spread wide there is nothing nonsexual about it all.
    Anonymous -- Tuesday January 11 2011, @05:29AM (#360762)


[ home | terms of service ]